To all players across every nation, and to the game developers:**
If you fly the US or German tech trees, invest in premium vehicles for a top-tier experience, or feel the compression at 12.0 BR (especially regarding the FA-18’s impact)—this analysis is for you.
**目录 **
Table of Contents
1. 致读者：谁需要关注这份提案？
1. To the Reader: Who Should Care About This Proposal?
2. 核心矛盾：美系FA18的失衡现状
2. Core Conflict: The Unbalanced State of the US F/A-18
2.1 写文章的原因，以及对不同国家差异化高级载具的追求
2.1 The Reason for Writing This Article, and the Pursuit of Differentiated Premium Vehicles Across Nations
2.2 美国FA18c高级载具所处于的令人沮丧的全方位下位：不止60发干扰弹困境
2.2 The Frustrating Comprehensive Inferiority of the US F/A-18C Premium Vehicle: Beyond the 60-Countermeasure Dilemma
2.3 FA18的角色定位
2.3 The Role Positioning of the F/A-18
2.4 为什么美国的FA18c的表现不佳
2.4 Why the US F/A-18C Performs Poorly
3. 解决方案：公平与特色如何兼得？
3. Solutions: How to Balance Fairness and Uniqueness?
3.1 基础诉求：升级至标准FA-18C（移除"Early"标签）
3.1 Basic Request: Upgrade to Standard F/A-18C (Remove “Early” Tag)
3.2 特色强化：2-6枚AIM-9M + BR动态调整13.0-13.3/13.3+
3.2 Uniqueness Enhancement: 2-6 AIM-9Ms + Dynamic BR Adjustment 13.0-13.3/13.3+
3.3 可行性对比：BOL吊舱为何目前不可行
3.3 Feasibility Comparison: Why BOL Pods Are Currently Infeasible
4. 玩家之声：付费体验与BR健康的双重诉求
4. Player Voices: Dual Demands for Premium Experience and BR Health
4.1 高级载具的核心价值：真金白银换真实战力
4.1 Core Value of Premium Vehicles: Real Combat Power for Real Money
4.2 BR压缩之痛：解压12.0环境迫在眉睫
4.2 The Pain of BR Compression: Decompressing the 12.0 Environment Is Urgent
5. 开发者建言：共赢调整路线图
5. Suggestions to Developers: A Win-Win Adjustment Roadmap
正文
Body
1. 各国家各系玩家及游戏的开发者，很抱歉占用你们一点时间。如果你打算研发或者已经研发过美系或德系科技树，如果你购买过高级载具并追求较好的体验，如果你对空战12.0权重的压缩问题感到困扰或者认为FA18破坏12.0环境。那么我推荐你们阅读这篇文章。
1.1 To all players across every nation, and to the game developers:
If you fly the US or German tech trees, invest in premium vehicles for a top-tier experience, or feel the compression at 12.0 BR (especially regarding the FA-18’s impact)—this analysis is for you.
2.1 我们知道随着新版本的推出，新版本同步上线了德国的fa18c高级载具，米格29高级载具等1系列高级载具。而之前一个版本推出的美国fa 18c早期型高级载具的性能与之相比不甚理想。
2.1 We know that with the release of the new update, the German FA-18C premium vehicle, MiG-29 premium vehicle, and a series of other premium vehicles were simultaneously introduced. However, the performance of the American F/A-18C Early premium vehicle released in the previous update is comparatively less satisfactory.
重要的事情说三遍：不要削弱德国FA18高级载具！不要削弱德国FA18高级载具！不要削弱德国FA18高级载具！
Let me state this emphatically: The German FA-18C premium vehicle must not be weakened!
这里发表这篇文章并不是为了削弱德国的fa 18c高级载具。而是为了在游戏开发商推出新载具礼包赚钱的同时使得所有购买高级载具的玩家能有更好的体验。
This article is not published to advocate for weakening the German FA-18C premium vehicle. Instead, its purpose is to ensure that while the game developers release new vehicle packs to generate revenue, all players who purchase premium vehicles can have a better experience.
每个国家最新的高级载具都应该拥有尽可能良好或者独特的体验。除非是因为不可预知的Br问题或者平衡性问题所导致的体验崩坏。
The newest premium vehicles for each nation should ideally offer a very good or unique experience. Exceptions should only occur if unforeseen Battle Rating (BR) issues or balance problems lead to a significantly compromised experience.
2.2 美国的fa 18c早期型与德国的fa 18c高级载具相比处于除了武器之外全方位的下位，而二者处于一个相同的Br。
2.2 The American F/A-18C Early is at a disadvantage in almost every aspect compared to the German FA-18C premium vehicle, except for weaponry, yet both share the same Battle Rating (BR).
让人感觉到沮丧的是这种下位是每方面都有一点，雷达，减半的干扰弹，发动机，rwr可监测频段……所有方面加起来让人有一点……
What is particularly frustrating is that this disadvantage manifests in numerous small ways: radar performance, half the countermeasure capacity, engine power, RWR detection bands… The cumulative effect of all these aspects is quite discouraging…
看一下最近发售的米格29高级载具，它拥有更好的机体最大速度，可以通过使用燃烧弹轰炸战区获得经验，也可以用它更好的带有数据链的导弹R27er，来进行作战。
Looking at the recently released MiG-29 premium vehicle, it boasts superior top speed, can effectively gain experience by bombing bases with incendiary bombs, and can engage effectively using its better R-27ER missiles with datalink capability.
它在轰炸战区方面的优势是现在任何其他可能碰到的高级载具所不能比拟的。
Its advantage in bombing bases is currently unmatched by any other premium vehicle it might face.
r27er除去机体雷达锁定的问题外，导弹本身极小的阻力和不错的动力使其可以做到：主动弹之下我最强，主动弹之上我的速度也可以一看，甚至可以和主动弹进行超视距空战。这就是一种独特的优势。
Aside from any radar lock limitations of the aircraft itself, the R-27ER missile’s exceptionally low drag and good propulsion allow it to excel: it’s arguably the best among non-active-radar missiles, and even against active-radar missiles, its speed makes it competitive, enabling Beyond-Visual-Range (BVR) combat against them. This represents a unique advantage.
2.3 那让我们看回FA18高级载具，问一问你自己，你觉得他的优势是什么？
2.3 Now, let’s look back at the FA-18 premium vehicle. Ask yourself, what do you perceive as its strengths?
在保证空战能力的同时，也可以在空闲时间炸一炸没有被轰炸的战区，或者在没有开任何空军科技树的同时兼顾一定的陆战历史模式对地能力。毫无疑问，德国的fa18高级载具做到了这一点。
It should maintain air combat capability while also being able to bomb uncontested bases when the opportunity arises, or provide reasonable ground attack capability in Ground Realistic Battles (GRB) even for players without an air tech tree unlocked. Undoubtedly, the German FA-18 premium vehicle achieves this.
2.4 但美国的fa18在体验上就要逊色许多，原因是什么呢？是因为其拥有的干扰物数量过少。
2.4 However, the American F/A-18 offers a significantly less satisfactory experience. The primary reason for this? Its severely limited countermeasure capacity.
在空战历史模式美国的FA18ce仅有60发的干扰弹影响了他的生存能力，两台大推力引擎使它非常容易成为红外弹的目标，糟糕的向下抛射的干扰物，使得他的热焰弹不是总能起到效果，可能会需要发射更多的热焰弹。
In Air Realistic Battles (ARB), the US F/A-18C Early’s mere 60 countermeasures significantly impact its survivability. Its two powerful engines make it a prime target for infrared missiles (IRMs). The poorly implemented downward-firing countermeasure dispensers mean its flares are not always effective, often requiring more flares to be expended per threat.
同时一旦面对更高权重的敌人，其装备的主动弹使得他大多数时间只能贴地飞行，这一点与其下抛的热焰弹结合使得热焰弹弹的效果大大降低，甚至会有一些玩家选择带少量的干扰箔，然后携带大量的热焰弹，通过一直贴地飞行的方式节约干扰箔用量，同时规避来袭的主动雷达弹。
Furthermore, when facing higher-BR opponents equipped with active radar missiles (ARHs), the F/A-18C Early often has to fly very low (“nap-of-the-earth”) to survive. This low altitude, combined with the downward-firing flares, drastically reduces flare effectiveness. Some players even resort to carrying minimal chaff, loading mostly flares, and flying constantly low to conserve chaff while trying to evade incoming ARHs by terrain masking.
陆战历史模式下，面对顶级房更多的末端红外制防空导弹和大量的主动雷达弹防空车。60发的干扰弹数量还需要对半分配给热焰弹和干扰箔，60发的数量完全不够用。这使得其在陆战历史模式的情况下所能发挥的作用也大大下降。
In Ground Realistic Battles (GRB), facing top-tier threats like numerous terminal IR-guided SAMs and many ARH-equipped anti-air vehicles (SPAAGs), the 60 countermeasures – which need to be split between flares and chaff – are woefully inadequate. This severely diminishes its effectiveness and utility in the GRB mode.
3. 因此我建议将美国的fa 18c早期型高级载具进行一定的加强。以下提出几个可能的解决方案：
3. Therefore, I propose that the American F/A-18C Early premium vehicle receive some strengthening. Here are several potential solutions:
3.1 1.补齐FA18c美国高级载具所缺少的干扰弹，并将名字更改为fa18c而不是fa18c早期型（我查证过历史资料fa 18c早期型是由fa 18a的机体改装而来，确实没有120发干扰弹，换而言之，除非发BOL否则想要获得更多干扰弹只有更改机型。）。
1. Provide the US FA-18C premium vehicle with its missing countermeasure capacity and rename it simply to “FA-18C” instead of “F/A-18C Early” (I have verified historical sources; the early F/A-18C models were indeed converted from F/A-18A airframes and did not have the 120-countermeasure capacity. In other words, to get more countermeasures without using BOL rails would require a different model variant).
2.将美国礼包的机体加强到与德国fa 18c高级载具相同的水平，并更名为fa18c。包括机体，雷达，航电，吊舱，引擎，干扰弹等各个方面。（这或许只是一个ctrl加c，ctrl加v的过程。）
2. Upgrade the US pack vehicle to match the German FA-18C premium vehicle in all aspects, including airframe, radar, avionics, targeting pods, engines, countermeasure capacity, etc., and rename it to “FA-18C”. (This might essentially be a straightforward copy-and-paste process.)
3.2 3.使得美国的fa18高级载具具有独特的优势，比如发2-6枚aim9m（比如，最少可以使机翼最外侧的两个挂点可以挂载两枚aim9m），同步升级到后期型机体，同时升高它的权重到13.0或者是13.3。发2-4枚9m升高权重到13.0，如果你想把它提升到大于等于13.3Br可能需要挂载六枚9m，反之亦然如果你想给他更多的aim9m就要承受这个代价。（这一点也可以解决。很多人提出的fa18破坏12.0及以下Br环境的问题。）
我建议大概是4枚9m，更新为后期型机体，同时升高权重到13.0比较好。
3. Grant the US FA-18 premium vehicle a unique advantage, such as the ability to carry 2-6 AIM-9M missiles (e.g., enabling at minimum the two outermost wing stations to carry AIM-9Ms) alongside an upgrade to a later model variant airframe, accompanied by an increase in its Battle Rating (BR). Equipping it with 2 to 4 AIM-9Ms could correspond to a BR increase to 13.0. Should you wish to place it at a BR of 13.3 or higher, it might require the capacity to carry six AIM-9Ms; conversely, granting it more AIM-9Ms would necessitate accepting this corresponding BR increase. (This approach could also address the issue raised by many players regarding the FA-18 disrupting the gameplay environment at BR 12.0 and below.)
Personally, I believe a configuration featuring approximately 4 AIM-9Ms, the upgraded later model variant airframe, and a BR increase to 13.0 represents a more balanced approach.
我们已经见到13.0的F2a高级载具，其挂在了四枚aim7m（比7p弱的雷达弹），四枚aam4（比9m更好，射程更长，过载更大的抗干扰红外弹）。而F2a的机体性能要好于fa18c，其在一马赫以下拥有仅次于台风和阵风的机动性。虽然其在一马赫以上的机动性较差，且满挂载的情况下，海平面仅能飞到1:05马赫。这一点是与fa18c相似的。但其拥有更好的格斗机体，rwr，非常强力的相控阵雷达…但缺失一定的对地攻击能力，算是互有优劣。
We have already seen the F-2A premium vehicle at 13.0, equipped with four AIM-7M radar missiles (weaker than the AIM-7P) and four AAM-4 infrared missiles (superior to the AIM-9M, with longer range, higher G tolerance, and better counter-countermeasures resistance). The F-2A’s airframe performance surpasses the FA-18C’s, offering agility below Mach 1 second only to the Eurofighter Typhoon and Dassault Rafale. While its agility above Mach 1 is worse, and it can only reach about Mach 1.05 at sea level with a full combat load (similar to the FA-18C), it possesses a superior dogfighting airframe, better RWR, and a very powerful AESA radar… though it lacks some ground attack capability. Thus, their strengths and weaknesses are somewhat balanced.
从这里看，将fa 18c高级载具2到6枚9m然后将权重提升到13.0或13.3，并非是不可接受的。同时aim9m在陆战历史模式下表现较好。
Given this context, equipping the FA-18C premium vehicle with 2 to 6 AIM-9Ms and raising its Battle Rating (BR) to 13.0 or 13.3 appears to be a reasonable adjustment. Additionally, the AIM-9M performs well, particularly in Ground Realistic Battles (GRB) conditions.
3.3 4.给美国的fa18提供bol吊舱，仅加强其生存性能，也可以解决干扰物问题，同时不用将18ce改名为18c。但其在其他方面仍处于微量的弱势，比如rwr不能像后期型那样识别铠甲及更好防空车的锁定。且过量的干扰物可能会影响更低权重的游玩体验。而且我们对美国的各种bol吊舱的实际性能并不算太了解。此方案过于极端且不平衡，所以此方案仅做推荐。
4. Provide the US FA-18 with BOL countermeasure pods. This would solely enhance its survivability by addressing the countermeasure issue, without needing to rename the “Early” model. However, it would still retain minor disadvantages in other areas, such as the RWR being less capable at identifying locks from systems like Pantsir and other advanced SPAAGs compared to later models. Moreover, the excessive countermeasure load could negatively impact lower-BR gameplay. Also, the precise performance characteristics of various US BOL pods are not fully understood. This solution is rather extreme and potentially unbalanced, so it is presented only as a tentative suggestion.
*4. 付费购买高级载具时，我们期待的是竞争力——而非妥协的体验
4. When we pay real money for a premium vehicle, we expect competitive performance—not a compromised experience."
4.1 或许有些人觉得前文提的那些问题无关痛痒，且如果你玩美系或者德系，那么问问你自己，如果将美国和德国的礼包的内容调换，你能接受吗？**
4.1 Perhaps some feel the issues mentioned earlier are insignificant. But if you play the US or German tech trees, ask yourself this: If the contents of the US and German premium packs were swapped, would you find that acceptable?
没人会为了过时的载具奔走呼号，在德国fa18高级载具发售之际，提出这个提案应该不会太晚。
No one actively advocates for outdated vehicles. With the German FA-18C premium vehicle now released, it should not be too late to present this proposal.
作为玩家，无论游玩任何国家都需要高级载具来快速研发科技树。而作为一架使用现实中货币购买的高级载具，其所获得的武器装备才是真实的。
As players, regardless of the nation we play, we rely on premium vehicles to accelerate tech tree research. For a premium vehicle purchased with real-world currency, the armament and equipment it provides are its tangible value.
比如：如果给a10装备aim9x，相当一部分权重高于它的飞机也不能无视其存在。毕竟从空中平台发射的aim9x的能量要高于现有路基防空车发射的aim9x。
For instance: If the A-10 were equipped with AIM-9X missiles, a significant number of aircraft at higher Battle Ratings (BR) could not afford to ignore it. After all, the kinematic energy of an AIM-9X launched from an aerial platform surpasses that of the same missile fired from current ground-based air defense vehicles.
随着游戏逐渐趋于平衡，其权重最终会与武器相适应。
As the game gradually moves towards better balance, the vehicle’s BR will ultimately be adjusted to match its armament.
在本国玩家社区对这份文稿征求意见时，遇到了有些关于f18ce的提议。比如：不增加诱饵弹数量，但降低权重到12.3。
During the feedback period for this draft within the player community, some alternative suggestions regarding the F/A-18C Early emerged. For example: not increasing the countermeasure capacity but lowering its BR to 12.3 instead.
这个是建议可能性并不大，而且社区中存在关于fa18破坏12.0权重环境的高赞帖子，会有大量玩家反对降低fa18ce的Br。所以如果你感觉在12.0受到了fa18的压制，可以选择投票将其升高到更高的Br。
However, the feasibility of this suggestion appears low. Furthermore, highly-upvoted posts within the community discuss the FA-18 disrupting the 12.0 BR environment, indicating significant player opposition to lowering the F/A-18C Early’s BR. Therefore, if you feel pressured by the FA-18 at 12.0, supporting an increase to a higher BR could be a viable option.
即使暂时降低权重到12.3也不过是昙花一现，将来必定会再次升高权重，而没有更好的武备会使其未来的环境更加糟糕。
Even if its BR were temporarily lowered to 12.3, this would likely be short-lived. It would inevitably be raised again in the future, and without improved armament, its performance at that higher BR would be even more challenging.
以及增强权重到13.0要面对14.0的台风，阵风。台风，阵风，随着权重的拉伸将来必然不会在14.0，他们的性能可能仅次于f22，su57，j20等第五代战斗机。但你此时收获的更好的武器却会一直伴随着你。
Raising its BR to 13.0 would mean facing opponents like the Typhoon and Rafale at 14.0. It’s important to note that the Typhoon and Rafale, given their performance which is arguably second only to 5th generation fighters like the F-22, Su-57, and J-20, will almost certainly not remain at 14.0 as BRs continue to expand. However, the improved weaponry acquired through this change would remain with the vehicle permanently.
切记你所花的真金白银购买来更好的武器才是真实的，绝对的。权重只是虚假的，相对的。
Remember: The superior weaponry obtained by spending real money represents a tangible and absolute enhancement. Battle Rating, in contrast, is a temporary and relative metric.
4.2 这也使得我们再次想起之前在论坛所看到的12.0上下的权重压缩问题。在12.0-14.0权重，F4鬼怪，F14雄猫，su27侧卫与目前十分先进的台风，4.5代战斗机阵风一同战斗在这样一个拥挤的权重。使得13.0上下的战斗激烈异常。
This also brings to mind the BR compression issues around 12.0 previously discussed on forums. Within the 12.0-14.0 BR range, aircraft such as the F-4 Phantom, F-14 Tomcat, Su-27 Flanker, and currently highly advanced fighters like the Typhoon and 4.5-generation Rafale are forced into combat within this overcrowded bracket. As a result, battles around 13.0 BR have become exceptionally fierce.
我们或许需要进一步解压空历权重，从游戏之前构建的平衡我们可以看到这样一个趋势。性能一般的雷达弹比如7F+性能相对同权重较好的红外弹9L的飞机VS携带少量性能更好雷达弹R27ER+性能相对较差红外弹R60的飞机。
We may need further decompression of Air Realistic Battle BR. From the game’s existing balance framework, we observe a pattern: Aircraft carrying average-performance radar missiles like the AIM-7F coupled with relatively better IR missiles (e.g., AIM-9L) for their BR are pitted against those equipped with fewer but superior radar missiles like the R-27ER plus lower-performance IR missiles (e.g., R-60).
但携带R27ER的飞机因为其导弹优秀的性能，甚至可以和主动弹进行对攻，尤其是携带大量R27ER的飞机。于是我们看到新的局面出现了，携带大量相对较弱雷达弹比如7P+携带较好红外弹的的飞机VS携带少量或者大量较好雷达弹R27ER+携带较差红外弹的飞机。
However, aircraft armed with R-27ERs can even engage in BVR exchanges against active-radar-homing missiles due to their exceptional missile performance, particularly when carrying multiple R-27ERs. Consequently, a new dynamic emerges: Aircraft loaded with numerous weaker radar missiles (e.g., AIM-7P) and better IR missiles now face opponents carrying either few or many superior radar missiles (R-27ER) paired with inferior IR missiles.
但这些飞机的权重不足够分散，不能使得一些弱势飞机有足够的权重间隔，以优化体验。
Yet the BR distribution of these aircraft remains insufficiently spread out. This fails to provide adequate BR separation for less competitive aircraft, preventing optimized gameplay experiences.
所以在想，历史上以及未来AIM-7P应该不会是F18的专属武器，是否其他的一些飞机也可以装备AIM-7P。
Thus, we consider: Historically and going forward, the AIM-7P should not be exclusive to the F/A-18. Could other aircraft also be equipped with the AIM-7P?
以形成一个挂载少量AIM-7P+更好红外弹VS挂载少/大量R27ER高性能雷达弹+红外弹的飞机/挂载其他主动弹的飞机的隔离权重，以减轻某些过低权重匹配过强的主动弹的几率（虽然不确定是否能做到完全隔离），同时为一些使用美制武器的国家提供迟来的装备——AIM-7P。
This would create isolated BR brackets featuring aircraft with few AIM-7Ps + better IR missiles versus those carrying few/many high-performance R-27ER radar missiles + IR missiles or other active-radar missiles. Such isolation could reduce the probability of lower-BR aircraft encountering overpowered active missiles (though full isolation may not be achievable). Additionally, it would provide long-overdue equipment—the AIM-7P—to nations using American weaponry.
因为这不是我所属国家的武器装备，这个可能需要比较了解的本国玩家进行相关建议的修正。欢迎大家在下面发起相关讨论。
As this involves weapon systems not from my nation, input from players knowledgeable about their respective countries’ arsenals may be needed to refine this proposal. We welcome everyone to initiate relevant discussions below.
5. 对于开发者则是：为什么那么多人非常乐意购买德国的礼包？而美国的礼包人们兴趣不佳？甚至还要在仅仅一个版本后就要进行一次反传统的打折（这一点导致了预购玩家被背刺，你们还有另一个选择：在德国FA18c高级载具发售后，给美国FA18c高级载具相同的机体配置）
5. For the developers: Why are so many players eager to purchase the German pack, while interest in the US pack is lukewarm? Why was there even an unconventional discount applied to the US pack just one update later? (This discount effectively undermined the value for players who pre-ordered the US pack. You had another option: to give the US F/A-18C premium vehicle the same configuration as the German one after the German FA-18C was released.)
我在玩家社区中观察到一部分人（包括我自己），对是否购买美国fa18ce高级载具抱有疑虑。原因正如上文中所提到的，他们也发出了各种各样的声音，使我能写出今天的提案。在此感谢他们。
Within the player community, I have observed a segment of players (myself included) expressing reservations about purchasing the US F/A-18C Early premium vehicle. The reasons for these reservations align with the points raised above. Their diverse perspectives and feedback were instrumental in shaping this proposal, and I offer them my specific acknowledgments.
我想有必要和游戏的开发者反馈这一玩家群体中广泛且客观存在的感受。
I believe it is essential to communicate this widely shared and objectively grounded sentiment among the player base to the game’s developers.
如果你想提高美国Fa 18c高级载具的销量那么加强它，使得它至少与德国的Fa 18c高级载具具有相同的水准。
If you wish to boost sales of the US F/A-18C premium vehicle, then strengthen it to bring it at least up to the standard of the German FA-18C premium vehicle.
重要的事情说三遍：不要削弱德国FA18高级载具！不要削弱德国FA18高级载具！不要削弱德国FA18高级载具！这很可能导致玩家，游戏开发商，社区管理者三输的局面。
Let me state this emphatically: The German FA-18C premium vehicle must not be weakened! This is absolutely critical – weakening it would create a lose-lose-lose scenario for players, the developer, and community moderators alike.
除此之外说一点题外话，关于大数据与游戏玩家的内心想法。采取大数据可以一定程度上辅助游戏的平衡，但不能作为主要手段，其无法反应玩家内心的想法，仅仅是冰冷的甚至过时的数据。
Additionally, let’s address an aside regarding big data and players’ genuine perspectives. While big data can partially assist game balancing, it should not be the primary method—it cannot reflect players’ true sentiments, being merely cold and often outdated statistics.
游戏社区中流传着这样一种说法，xxx版本是最平衡也是新玩家增长最快的版本。在玩家们看来一定的平衡性可以吸引更多的玩家加入游戏。或许可以去查查后台大数据交叉验证一下。有更多的新鲜血液，开发商才有更多的收益。
A prevailing notion within the gaming community suggests that Version XXX was both the most balanced and fastest-growing in new player acquisition. Players believe reasonable balance attracts more participants. Developers could cross-verify this by examining backend big data. More new players directly translate to greater revenue.
甚至如果有人提议一到三个版本不大量更新游戏内容，而仅对游戏做成优化和平衡性调整。或许会有大量的玩家支持。（或许之后可以进行社区投票，我不知道如何在论坛设置这种东西）
In fact, if a proposal were made to halt major content updates for 1-3 versions, focusing solely on optimization and balance adjustments, significant player support would likely follow. (A community vote could be initiated later, though I’m unsure how to implement this on forums.)
做多收益的方法不止一种，收益=数量×单价，提高数量也是一种有效的提高收益的方法。
There are multiple ways to increase revenue. Given Revenue = Quantity × Unit Price, boosting player quantity remains a viable strategy.
另外如果开发商一定做一款新游戏的话，大家大概会觉得那大概是战争雷霆2（请仔细分析一下你家产品的共同点，看看它吸引而来的都是什么类型的用户）
Furthermore, if developers insist on creating a new game, the consensus would likely point to “War Thunder 2.” (We urge you to carefully analyze your product’s core appeal and identify the user demographics it attracts.)
希望在开发商能够开心赚到钱的同时，玩家也能开心的游玩。而不是花大量的时间去查资料写这种稿子。
The hope is that while the developers successfully generate revenue, players can also enjoy their experience. So that players don’t have to spend significant time researching and writing articles like this one.
文章由AI辅助翻译并优化语句
This article has been translated with AI assistance and optimized for language expression.