The prototype was finished and had a functioning new turret
Yes but did it have V-2 in the end?
The engine?
Yes, as the SO-122 was based on the M-634 rather than a base M4A3E4.
M-634 was an M4A3E4 but with T-34 engine, the SO-122 was a further modification of this.
2 Likes
BAe EAP/ACA: Formerly denied, I proved it works so I’d like to see that for the UK’s next addition.
Link: The British Mini-Typhoon the BAe EAP - #18 by Rileyy3437
Tanks made after the year 2000 should gst bino thermals. Seripusly if i can get 2 day shipping on a thermal monocular then i shpuld be able to use thermals in bino view without needing the CITV.
1 Like
Bino Thermals would be too OP I think
Not if theyre low quality and of a lower max zoom.
IA-63 Pampa 2000 (USA)
We need this as a modification
9 Likes
Would kinda make it more of tank destroyer because of limited fire angles.
That would probably be alright if there was a turnout mechanic, so the commander had to be vulnerable using it.
Praga went to USSR also and it still had no connection to it. Only connection that it had was that we were occupied by Soviets…and Lithuania was sadly part of USSR. This is what i think will be the sad reality.
The engine does support that. Thats a mechanic in enlisted.
As you can see the external cover is hooked onto the main gun.
Tbis means the main gun would have 0° of elevation and 0° of traverse.
This was used to hide it and move it around a storage lot without the germans immediately knowing it was a tank.
Pucara “Charlie”
Spoiler
6 Likes
1 Like
You should at least put a sourse of it. Fan mad laod out.
2 Likes
Challenger 2-LEP (life extension program)
basically Challenger 2.5 or Challenger 3 prototype (the turret’s still Chally 2 based and without Trophy hard kill APS)
3 Likes
I thought it was a different turret