A5M（Q-5M）Integration of China Italy technology
10 Likes
INB4 gaijin don’t give it countermeasures ( and missiles) like the Q-5L for the longest time (((((
2 Likes
Looks like a sleeker mozy, i need it. Question is, will it go to britain or america… Arguments for both but i would prefer it go to britian, but i dont mind either way as i have both nations.
Based on prior precedents it will probably go to America, Britain has a surprisingly low portion of the lend-lease aircraft it purchased and an even lower portion of those made specifically for Britain as a customer.
Some argue it detracts from the US tree and dilutes the British tree, but I argue the vehicles wouldn’t exist without the UK as a customer and as a result of leaving these vehicles out, the holes the vehicles filled irl are left empty in-game.
(This is a statement about lend-lease as a whole, as for this specific P-38, i’m not too fussed).
2 Likes
- EBRC Jaguar during a firing exercise on a landing craft.
12 Likes
For naval?
With the m4a5 (Ram II) coming to us i hope we end up finally getting our boardhound, m22 and other such tanks. I dont mind the skink going to america but i think it wouldnt be fair on us if we dont get some of the tanks we ordered from them. Such as the grant being a premium for us… Along with other canadian tanks going to other nations.
A certain Canadian is approaching your exact location right now at extreme speed, change it to “Ram II” before its too late.
3 Likes
I know its the wrong name, but most people would know it as the m4a5 sadly…
1 Like
And that why we fight to fix it. As misinformation is a big problem.
Is it same as base M1A2? or is comparable to sepv3?
Imagine Gaijin putting it into the Chinese TT. then act as a spy in simulator battles. hust like the Swedish T80U :D
m60a3:
Sep V3
2 Likes
*SEPv2
…
“The M1A2T is a custom M1A2’X’ with analog modifications, with the turret structure and sights equivalent to the M1A2 SEPv2, but the onboard electronics equivalent to the M1A1 SA standard.
Most of its subsystems is similar to the M1A2S or M1A2K”.
(*M1A2K: the new Kuwaiti M1A2 variant, M1A2S: new Saudi variant)
opinion, given Gaijin already put them together and I havent heard a whisper of them splitting
So it’s an opinion that the ROC (Taiwan) is the same as the PRC (Communist China)
except IRL, M1A2T is an actual RoC inducted equipment/platfrom.
Your opinion is that you think that they shouldnt be in the same techtree due to geopolitical issues
Both are “china” as both gouvernments claim ownership of the entire nation and that they are the real China whilst the other gouvernment are rebels, although Taiwan has started to form it’s own national identity as of recently. The only issue with putting them together is that the techtree as a whole is under the PRC flag, as doing anything else would result in a swift and instant ban from the PRC which is a huge source of income for Gaijin.
9 Likes