Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees)

battlerog · July 13, 2024, 12:02am

GIB the god dam renard planes now that we have belgium

Renard R.31

Renard R.32 (booth engin config)

Renard R.36

Renard R.37

Renard R.38 and Renard 40 (mostly similar)

Renard R.42 (twoo R.38 sticked together)

goblin_cleaver · July 13, 2024, 12:18am

Looks interesting +1

RycotSS · July 13, 2024, 1:23pm

Looks like the one we have in-game as it has that ball sight on the turret.

somebody_Else · July 13, 2024, 4:57pm

Probably the same, the camo nets in the Malaysian trial are interesting though.

mr_boo · July 13, 2024, 5:26pm

Unfortunately the R.31 is probably too weak for reserve tier and the R.42 wasn’t built :(
Maybe if we’re lucky they could add the R.40 since it was under construction and 70% finished by the time it got destroyed but i doubt it

The R.36 is definitely a must-have tho

battlerog · July 13, 2024, 5:32pm

if fit’s the requirment to be clasified as a unfinished prototype , so it can come

mr_boo · July 13, 2024, 5:49pm

The requirements for a suggestion yes but when’s the last time an unfinished prototype was added

VonMarder · July 13, 2024, 6:26pm

341

mr_boo · July 13, 2024, 6:38pm

The Coelian? A decade ago?

battlerog · July 13, 2024, 6:44pm

nope , there were some more recent addition

for exemple the most recent one is the Zerstörer 45 , because althought the weapon system and the platform already existed , there has never been any form of documentation that has yet to surface confirming the layout of the tank , and it was only mention in a book later on that suposedly 1 prototype was finished , with no other proof of it’s existence past an idea and name

(may i precise the book is post war to , it’s not a official document like the O-I)

the OSTWIND II share’s the exact same issue , and is know in the exact same way from the exact same guy , this is why it made noise back then , althought gessing the layout there is clearly simplier then the other

mr_boo · July 13, 2024, 6:45pm

Such as?

MAUSWAFFE · July 13, 2024, 6:51pm

Most recent one I can think of is the Yak-141, which was prptotyped, but never equipped in the intended armed configuration seen in game.

battlerog · July 13, 2024, 6:52pm

that one to , altought it was fully built (it was just missing the armement as you pointed out) , and were more talking about partialy built vehicles

Pheonix_RX01 · July 13, 2024, 7:01pm

Im pretty sure ive seen those camo nets before on some of the other early photos of the cv90120 doing trials in sweden.

VonMarder · July 13, 2024, 7:07pm

Would experimental weapons work too?

It would open posibilitys for some vehciels to get in lower or even higher BR´s. Or must a weapon always be attached to a vehicle to be considert?

DevilO6 · July 13, 2024, 7:13pm

I would like to say it is consistent, but it is not. You have to have a bit of luck, and maybe it will be passed.

MAUSWAFFE · July 13, 2024, 7:14pm

I think Gaijin consensus is it should be compatible, but apart from that it’s up to them.

I’d personally go with “in service at the same time” or “prototyped, intended for the vehicle” as additional requirements, but that’s just my personal preference and Gaijin isn’t bound to any of that.