Shhhhhh, I badly explained as always
Nah you’re all good, just ironing things out before a tsunami from hell falls on this forum.
The tsunami will come anyway, many people claim that Canada should be a sub tree of USA because our country’s are next to each other 🙄
3 Likes
I never understand why people want a sub tree for US. We have so many cool domestic options that a sub tree is just not needed (it quite literally won’t fit). Besides, Gaijins implementation of sub trees is absolutely horrendous, I don’t want a bunch of copy paste garbage.
4 Likes
They want our cool stuff I guess
Gaijin plz FV101
6 Likes
Ya, the US need it US LAVs, like those, no need for the Canadian/Commonwealth ones. Tho I belive their is a fair bit more than that, but it’s a mess, even more so when you can’t look into the fate of some groups, like the was at least 4 LAV-700s, but only two seem to have enough known to end up suggestions. Or when no anything exist, only an image, so it’s unknown how it relates to the nation that could be involved.
This is probably going to be the worst out of all the missile-only LAVs, just due to how frustrating the turret is in WT alrady but looks like the ATM version got rid of that issue.
Like I like the M901, but oh boy, can its turret be frustrating, and looking at the LAV-AT, I feel pain.
LAV-AT
The LAV-ATM, on the other had look like it’s fine. It looks like the turret doesn’t fold.
LAV-ATM:
Same with the Canadian LAV-III TUA here, as I’m pretty sure it uses the Norwegian turret(or at least one similar) like the Canadian M113 TUA does.
3 Likes
Also interesting picture of the base J-15; equipped with 4x YJ-91, 2x KD-88 and 4x PL-8, very rare seen loadout.
I want em so badly…
J-15T hopefully with tested WS-10H and PL-12A at least >_>
9 Likes
fingers crossed we get the WS-10H and PL-12A to the J-15T when it comes to the game
3 Likes
i’d love to have the Nanchang Q-6 tbh
5 Likes
Yes that is true, and unfortunately it will probably be added before any other LAV, because both the LAV hull and turret are in the game already, so it’s easy to copy and paste.
Did not even know the LAV-700 was a thing if I’m being honest. Seems fairly similar to the LAV-AG though, would probably be easier to just add it.
I can see that happening, even if it would be more ideal to see others first.
They are relatively obscure (no Wikipedia page), and of the models seen, two are in service with Saudi Arabia. Cockerill turrets/guns on what are said to be modified LAV-6 hulls. Online, the LAV-700s also seem to be known as “Desert Viper”.
(I’ve likely summoned a Belgian with these, and what I have said)
7 Likes
So there are a couple different variants? I did a quick google search and just saw the Cockerill one with the 105mm. They look cool though. I think I also saw one with just a .50 cal on it.
1 Like
Ya, there is a few at least 5 variants built, but with lack of info on the line not sure about any others.
There is the 4 here with Belgian turrets and guns and a 5th with a different turret the US tested, one of the few time you’d see it not in a desert camo.
1 Like
Those are sick af, I didn’t know about those wither. More fun for the UK Tree
so 30mm RWS could still happen?
christ
how many CM’s and what EW suite?
the Stryker is based on the LAV III
still GDLS, just happens to operate in Canada because they got GM Diesel which made the first LAV for a Canadian contract, and then carried on their work in the existing factory.
why UK, if they are from GDLS and not even commonwealth operated?
1 Like
I won’t even have a conversation with you, Americans simp
2 Likes