dude its a TD, far far from being the production variant,
they used an M1A1 turret & modified it ~ they gotta start somewhere, assess what works and what not and then build a dedicated turret around the agreed criteria.
Abrams X was more of a concept.
1 Like
Yeah I guess, but still, I will personally hate the US army is they dare put anything like this into service.
Where is the European Canadian in the picture? Idk who the guy with the glasses are, but the other guy is Los pollos lol
It would be nice to have later versions of some French rank 7 jets, like the F-8 (F-8P) and Super Etendard, with Magic IIs are other late stuff
Ofc the Brits want to steal something for them
/j
wtb Random generate maps.
fix the weird visiblity thing at long distance, getting tired of staring at a guy in the open that’s invisible until they shoot at ya
Scorpion 90!! PLEASE IM BEGGING HERE
5 Likes
John Cockerill is developing a 105 mm gun capability for the EBRC Jaguar.
2 Likes
That would be awesome, it would even be further interesting if France were to adopt it (likely an export option). On a side note, still waiting to see France with some hard-kill APS
1 Like
And A VERY important message for all the US main, the LAVS are built in Canada and used by us, so no reason to be in the US tree
I think it should go to the Great Britain/UK Tree but I can see why people think it could go to USA as well being how close both nations operate as well as Canada and the US using joint technology. I used to work at a joint Canadian-American command so I saw it first hand.
But yes, LAV’s are made in Canada and used by both nations.
The USA use our LAV for the LAV 25, that it
And I’m pretty sure the cooperation is done
I was making a general, unbiased statement for equipment as a whole, like aircraft and weapons. We also use around 8-10 variants of the LAV in the USMC.
It’s not, my friends who are in the RCN are still stationed in the US.
LAV-25, LAV-AG, LAV-AT, LAV-ATM, all operated by US (More specifically, all used by the USMC). LAV-AG was a project for the USMC even more specifically.
1 Like
Yeah I know that, I didn’t said all
Those are fine to be in the USA
2 Likes
The LAV that USA use and modify can be in the US tree
3 Likes
Based on your statement above (at least to me), it seemed like you were saying the US had no right to ANY LAV’s, which would be a pretty interesting statement. I do agree though, if the US had nothing to do with it, it shouldn’t be there.
2 Likes