Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 2)

“everyone else”
looks at RU, GB, JP, CN, & SW.
FnF atgms are the exception not the rule. Only 4 out of 10 nations have FnF atgms.
(only DE (PARS), IT (Spike), FR (Spike), & IS (Spike))

6 Likes

fyi France has PARS too, specifically TRIGAT

3 Likes

my bad! I couldn’t remember what France had so checked the wiki, and stopped as soon as I saw “spike”. didn’t realise it was both (oops!)

Imo they never should have been added. Impossible to balance from a fun to use vs fun to fight perspective.

Was getting spawn killed by a PARS spammer on Arctic the other day, literally hovering above the helicopter pad and ducking as soon as he saw SPAA but already let rip his entire arsenal into our spawn.

1 Like


It was shown off with
DM63 and M892A1

Yes but they are slow and uneffective compare to apfsds

There’s no new shell it’s still the old APFSDS. Its length was increased at some point in the past which could result in an increase of penetration :

Spoiler

CTA still markets it as 140mm RHA at 1500m though, so if it’s introduced in game it will most likely be similar to the top APFSDS found on Strf 4090C

the training shell is M829, just some dumb models, but the actual usable ones are KEWA1


The one on the left M865 is training ammo not M829A1
GvlAa4WaUAACPVM

1 Like

T-72M2E
t-72m2e-and-t-72m2-moderna-slovakia-attempt-at-t-72-v0-ze8fld0ue4je1
t-72m2e-and-t-72m2-moderna-slovakia-attempt-at-t-72-v0-qbhrhx2ue4je1
ee91b826d025a6f4bc896ab104fbc40e
tjs2ycliauv61

7 Likes

The dual 20’s have always looked nice

2 Likes

Looks awfully impractical to aim

T-72 “shygys”
the-best-t-72-modernisation-v0-6sud629nuend1


T-72_MBT_Shygys_Aselsan_main_battle_tank_KADEX_2016_Astana_Kazakhstan_002

2 Likes

Iranian T-72 “Rakhsh”



2 Likes

T-72MN (object 172-2m equipped with 130mm cannon)
Объект-172МН-Object-172MN

3 Likes

PBV 401

pbv401-rb56
y05ExH5
790185_original
image

7 Likes

you just thought too much about a information board made by someone who know nothing
from ARMS SALES NOTIFICATION; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 113

Yeah I’ve seen this. But it’s from 2019.
I’m more inclined to believe what they showed with the tank instead of an old document since they didn’t show the KEW

But M829A1 isn’t usually exported so either way doesn’t really matter


And the document makes it quite clear it’s a potential sale. so not a defacto list on things they got

approved so no longer potential, and no any changes about it in flowing years.

I’m not trying to argue I’m right or anything like that.

Just saying what I chose to believe.
Which obviously makes no difference.

the first abrams was delivered 5 years after that document was made and everything doesn’t always get disclosed in arms deals.

But I digress, I’m just speculating not trying to argue facts

2 Likes