Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 1)

It’s not goofy, is Emanuel.

2 Likes

French Leopard noises intensify

European tech tree soon?🤗😉

Yeah, yeah.

I like the original ones massive muzzle brake personally, but that’s just me.

:-(

B-b-but, I like it.

1 Like

IIAF Camouflage for the Persian F-14.

K2 Black Panther w/ Trophy APS and Turret/Hull Side ERA


Vehicle was seen at KADEX 2024.

  • Sneaking suspicion that if a United Korea tree doesn’t come to fruition, China is going to get a DPRK sub-tree and the US will get an ROK sub-tree.
6 Likes

any new ammo?

17278953599623159841853244946832
PT-94
Looks a lot like Challenger 2

2 Likes

Yep, but like most 90’s vehicles from slavic countries, this project was abandoned, which is sad.

Few extra images

image

image

3 Likes

did it have functional turret?

17278957473455866596066415666112

6 Likes

I don’t think so, but allegedly the autoloader was fitted, do take that with a grain of salt though. This is an artist representation.

image

2 Likes

Dont you dare doubt Polish engineers!
(give them enough vodka and they will mount a working V12 inside Mt. Everest)

3 Likes

I, highly doubt it, but idk.

If the UK had modified this domestically similarly to how Korea modified theirs this could have been very good for the UK.

ah, the Polish T-34-85 vismod à la Leopard 1.
Honestly, would like this in WT. Polish/Visgerad TT when?

1 Like

Well … S.Koreans did not modify their ‘Abrams’ strictly speaking.
Chrysler offered them a variant, derivative of their XM1 Abrams design (likely to suit SK’s hilly terrain and also easier for them to produce, since they had no prior knowledge/experience of tank building or designing).
It had trade-offs compared to M1.
Talking strictly the OG variant here, the K1-88 didn’t have bustle ammo storage and was powered by a 1200hp diesel engine.
But on the upside, it did have partial hydropneumatic suspension & hunter-killer capability compared to standard base M1 of the time.
It was a slightly smaller & lighter design.
UK was looking for off the shelf solution for Chally 1 replacement and Leo 2 was nearly finalized. It was the then Gulf War performance of Chally 1 that convinced them to invest in local development, leading to adopting Chally 2 upgrade.
But rest assured if Leo 2 or its close 2nd choice M1A2 were adopted, some minor mods would’ve been included as well. (like the tea boiling vessel is an absolute must).
[The diesel Abrams came too late or could’ve beat both Leo 2A4 or Chally 2]
(Ideally I think, adopting Leo 2 chassis + Vicker’s Chally 2 turret would’ve been a better solution. Local development + their beloved rifled goodness mated to a more capable hull with better performance à la modern Vickers Mk.7Pro … and the new Chally 3 would’ve been more closely related to Leo 2A7)