Couldn’t they use a truck for that job?
A truck would be fine for long distances, but for just around the facility, putting it on a tracked chassis is a lot more convenient.
Why is everyone obsessed with adding in the most ugly, modern vehicle’s possible? Vehicle’s whereby data is extremely limited and will never behave how people expect or live up to people’s expectations.
How dare you call these ugly. I shall ask you to see yourself off.
Because balancing ifvs is much easier than balncing mbts with untold hundreds of MM of armor and penetration.
Also because i actually play top tier and wanting more vehicles added to said tier is the obvious decision.
Also also this issue of not knowing a thing about modern tanks actual performamce started as soon as they added the kpz/mbt70 and t64a like 6 years ago, so a little bit late for you to complain about people asking for more.
1 Like
AMR 35 ZT-1, M2A2 but better.
4 Likes
This is the load out I would wish for if they decided to split the 4000 into a tech tree and event/squadron/premium, with this being the latter.
The final version with dual or the planned triple pylons should be tech tree.
Weird stuff like this would be great if they’re made into premiums and events.
I wish that the Leopard 2 prototypes weren’t locked behind events and the market.
5 Likes
What is that!?
Donar
1 Like
A-37 Dragonfly
TA-4H/TA-4J Ayit: could possibly make way for an overhaul for the existing A-4H i.e getting more advanced weapons, new visual model and paired up with the A-4N while the TA-4H/TA-4J can replace it’s role as a A-4 without advanced weaponry
J-35J
Strikemaster Mk.82
Lansverk L-180 (mod.1974): Irish Modification of the L-180, replaced the Madsen 2mm with a Hispano 20mm instead among some other changes
CV90 AMOS
Henschel-Sadena HWK-13: Joint Germano-Mexican APC & Light Tank with a turret from the ECR-90, note: Mexico classifies it as a “Medium Tank” however it will get the same treatment as the TAM
AML-60-20 Serval
HESA Saeqeh
12 Likes
Aww cute mini F-18
3 Likes
f-18 if you will.
3 Likes
XP-1
8 Likes
ZAK-23E
USSR, probably 9.0-9.3 (to fill up an empty space from 8.0-10.0 whenever Strela moves up)
Or any ZSU23-4 modernisation (theres too many to list tbh)
2 Likes
Gaijin has so much potential to add so much Draken version, both from Sweden and Finland. Hell…even a F-35 Draken. Which is pretty much a CAS draken with bomb computer.
I feel like the ZSU-23-4M4 would be perfect.
Iglas and a better radar for fast movers and high AOA.
1 Like
Maybe but you can see vehicles like Gepard 1A2 and LAV AD being placed at 9.7 and 10.3 with around same rockets, sure you can say that ZSU doesnt pen or damage as much, has worse mobility and armour but even that it probably will still be a 9.7 material.
I just want 9.0-9.3 have a chance to fight off the air targets like A4s, SAABs that are 8.3-8.7 with little to no counter, ZSUs USSR has rn have terrible range and radars.