It feels strange to see things such as AMX-10P being classified as SPAA or the plethora of SPHs being classed as tank destroyers, but I guess Gaijin picks and chooses what it classes certain vehicles. Almost surprises me that the Type 87 RCV or BTR-80A aren’t considered SPAAs.
I’m perfectly happy with the AMX-10P where it is. It’s where I asked to put it, since it’s still is functionally a light tank anyways but fills the MASSIVE AA gap.
1 Like
I was quite disappointed when France’s first IFV turned out to be a premium, so I’m glad it didn’t take too long for the AMX-10P to arrive after it.
Now it’s a case of waiting for something Chinese though… and Israel could use plenty of help too
1 Like
Ah, I’m very forgetful it seems. :)
God its ugly tho
1 Like
Cute not ugly
It’s kind of like a new born baby. It’s ugly but you have to love it for how precious it is.
1 Like
Roughly 1000kph, agile is true, only dumb bombs and rockets, AIM9Ls only came with the late variant which still wouldnt be 10.7 worthy
To who do you propose it should’ve went?
Alpha jetshould definetly get a variant without aim9ls at a much lower br.
Premium late variant Alpha Jet so Germany can join the braindead all aspect 10.0 seal club gang.
Sadly that’s what I fear. At least it won’t do that much harm, because the br bracket is already broken
lol
It carries Mavericks. Basically an A-10A, but a lot faster, more agile, and better climb rate. 1,160km/h top speed (mach .85) vs 642 (at alt)
61m/s climb vs 25.3
.8 TWR max vs .62
191kg/m2 vs 482 (lower is better)
It’s got a lower payload, sure, but it would be a far, far better fighter than the A-10A (Late). I could see maybe 10.3 but I’d rather avoid another broken missile bus, especially since 10.3 will be fighting many flareless subsonic aircraft.
Sure yeah I just didn’t want to put repeat vehicles in the list and would rather have a sorta mid-life Alpha Jet than a nerfed very early version, especially with the A-10, A-6, Su-25, and Harriers giving all the other big nations an all-aspect armed attack aircraft.
Every country should have an 8.7 HUMVEE TOW equivalent.
1 Like
IMO Poland and Czechoslovakia have more than enough vehicles by themselves to each be a separate, full tree. I’d rather not the two be combined, because that could mean overcrowding of vehicles could push out some cool stuff from the tree at certain BRs. Poland in particular is overflowing with interesting and unique IFVs that would be a shame to compete with limited tree space with Czech IFVs.
Though I know a lot of people have a somewhat bizarre distaste for copy paste vehicles (even though the country literally used them???) which is the state of Poland’s rank II and III. At least in the ~500 vehicle tech tree I’ve compiled. Though IDK if Czechoslovakia would remedy that. Either way, this isn’t really the place to discuss trees lol.
1 Like
I wouldn’t necessarily say that, there’s ways to add both in the same tree.
That’s just all politics which has nothing to with being in game
Praga? To no one