Hmm yes, so true
4 Likes
Not if it goes to Finland lol those things will be made artificially worse if gaijin has anything to say about it.
2 Likes
isnt that a BUK?
Aside from the one new map, the main change seems to have been w/ regard to the naval target sets.
The initial changes to NE maps on dev were the enabling of the new airfield logic, and more recently the addition of the newly added earlier SAM sites to replace the existing ones in the lower brackets ( HAWK(early) and HAWK(1970) replacing I-HAWK, Buk replacing Buk-M3 )
Now they’ve added a new system of reference to the naval target unit sets, and updated the waypoint logic to match. There are now two sets of naval units, covering all four NE brackets from 1970(early) to 2018 ( unlike the SAM sites, which are split into 1970(early), 1970(late), 1980, and 2018 )
Maybe we’ll see a wider range of naval targets once the new carriers and escorting ships mentioned as in development in the CM update are ready, or when the playable Naval NE test comes.
Well I mean Finland stopped using them once they got the Ito 90M, they began shifting air defense to different vehicles
It has appeared. For some reason not on Etendard. Amazing.
1 Like
If the Gripen was the priority, why are we not receiving Mk4
Because the devs didn’t do research, look at the ASHM-3 300km range. Gungnir also has that but gaijin decided a ground launched model with their ideal range is what we should get, now wether they update the stats to represent what they named it is up in the air.
It is iresome, to say the least.
If i miss a mark i can just GE it right?
I mean it’s the same with them deciding to not give missiles to the AJ37 or Entendard. Dev choice
yes
Yes
Ok good i need my beloved XL… i promised not to spend more money on this game but here we go
when a rear radar in B-52 will be in the game?
When devs feel like it
Which are also less than intelligent decisions. Update’s a bit rubbish. To think it was shaping up to be almost good.