I got a feeling that Indonesian air sub tree might be the next one in this update idkw but I just have that ick
Larp as polishthunder
1 Like
(the most famous Polish that i could remember)
1 Like
Day (insert number here) of waiting for India to get a seperate tech tree
1 Like
4 Likes
That’s me when gaijin finally adds Finnish ammo to their vehicles
1 Like
Son
1 Like
2 Likes
1 Like
3,285 days waiting for the Brazil sub-tree.
1 Like
They forgot F-15EX devblog today as well…
3 Likes
Hi. This isn’t a bug. The rack immediately behind the gun is the one to be consumed first, which is the closest and most convenient for the loader. Followed by the reserve ready rack at the bottom of the turret.
4 Likes
do I even wanna know what he wrote to prompt the mspaint rose?
1 Like
The only aspect that I could see being a bug is the fact the floor rack is currently filling first, before any rounds are put in the bustle rack. If the bustle rack is being consumed first then it should be the first to be filled, and if you really wanted you could take 9 shells into battle and not stow any ammo in the hull. Not that that would be a particularly great idea.
1 Like
Precisely;
Because the bustle the most convenient rack for the loader, it makes no sense that, if you load only 12 shells, you go into battle with shells in the floor, but with less shells in the bustle.
i dont know if you are brave enough
Speaking of bugs,
How come y’all fixed the Greek Sabre’s engine but not the sidewinders?
While keeping it at 9.0 btw…
Or is it the classic one step forward two steps back again?
God bless it’s not a premium so if there’s nerfs to be had y’all pop em on instantly ( lul lul)
We haven’t had anything to “fix” with them. They are listed on the Greek Air Force website and we currently have no information to suggest it cannot use them.
2 Likes
I haven’t played nuclear escalation since it came out, let me guess as to what is actually viable for NATO aircraft
It’s either F-15E with GBU-53 rain or F-18E with JSOW, with everything else being crap, am I right on the money?