Next Major Update - Rumor Roundup & Discussion

Continually complaining is a great way to get views and is easy content.

I sometimes watched his stuff when I came across it, but I really started disliking him after his Heavy Cavalry update video, where he used a clickbait-ass thumbnail that wasn’t even remotely close to being factually true.

And the worst part was when he advocated for Gaijin to basically stop making anything for naval and remove copy-pasted vehicles, despite players having already put a ton of time into unlocking and grinding that content. Especially when he was talking about how quitting feels bad because you’re losing all that hard work. Yet apparently it’s fine to remove someone else’s vehicles and even entire game modes just because he personally doesn’t enjoy them.

Then, after getting criticized for his stance on naval, he backpedaled by saying he meant naval should be improved and that everyone had misunderstood him. Lmao. To me, that just came across as backpedaling because he didn’t want to admit that he had a shitty opinion.

4 Likes

Him complaining about Russia getting the T-90M Arena was peak, acting like it was an incredibly strong tank when calling it mid is already being kind to it.

3 Likes

Top-tier Russia, especially on the mbt side, is pretty mid. Their CAS is really their saving grace for anything post 12.0, but aside from that, their tanks are fairly easy to deal with as nato tanks actually get some decent rounds up there.

10.3–11.3 Russia is a different story, though, since they have some absolutely stacked lineups there and excellent vehicles like the T-80UD.

1 Like

why? toptier is BVR mostly anyway, F-16s have no place there with just 6 missiles, getting AIM-9X/IRIS-T wont be game changing for them

Will IR Mica be even that good?

We bake our rant here in forums idk what they are putting in them outside

That’s cause, they only make videos they know, people will hate watch

1 Like

A new skin crate dropped

Some of my Favs


afbeelding

afbeelding

I wouldn’t trust that at the moment though.

CAMM is meant to have DL but I dont think it’s enabled currently

It is, they fixed it some time ago.

Missed that they had fixed it

What will be the new ammunition type bvvd talked about ?

cope for anti-airfield weaponry
2v17vq1

AFDS mostly for the AUP

1 Like

Only options are:

  • CBUs (were beta tested during the NT event on MLRSs)
  • Anti-Runway / Cratering weapons (this could be part of CBUs though with things like JP233)
  • Decoy / EW weapons (Like Spear-EW)
  • Cruise missiles (like Storm Shadow)

or it could be a new seeker on an existing weapon type

  • IIR seekers for A2A missiles (probably not actually IIR, but things like ASRAAM, Aim-9X, etc added to aircraft)
  • MMW (things like Brimstones and GBU-53)

The final option could be nukes as loadout options rather than relying on a generic default aircraft for the role.

It could also have been a miss translation and it was referring to Towed Radar Decoys. (Which we saw a control for on the last dev server)

I havent seen any other ideas for what it could be except for those.

2 Likes

Yes

1 Like

Day 14 of waiting for Cypriot sub tree

Please note that they specifically wrote “a new TYPE of ammunition.” Air‑to‑air missiles are not considered a new type.

Why not?

It is a new TYPE of A2A missile as nothing in-game currently has an IIR A2A missile

In much the same way that an AGM-65B could be considered a different TYPE of weapon to the AGM-65D due to the different seeker

Its a new type of weapon. Not a seeker.

Both of these are AGMs.

5 Likes

So you basically confirming CBUs then

or is that just classed as a TYPE of bomb and thus not a new weapon?

We have plenty of entirely new types of weapons to consider, beyond even those you listed. So we are confirming nothing at this time.

2 Likes