because as smin said earlier they often add a squadron vehicle from the nation they plan to add to that tree? hence the M1A1 AIM going to the british tree as a squadron tank, also US mains would have cried if it was added as just a tech tree tank
1 Like
i have no idea what any of this proves
Why would we ever need a subtree? There’s an unbelievable amount of vehicles still missing from the US. (Especially light tanks)
they should have kept the 5th line as the SA / Sub tree line
yes I thought he said to put it in the tree that the teaser vehicle was added in?
Clearly it’s a British program because it’s a challenger and not a independent German program unrelated to the British
mostly to secure vehicles that rightfully belong in the US tree anyways
very true.
this exists
2 Likes
Basically just saying you were wrong calling it challanger times like 5
Japan is just becoming a sub tree when it gets south k (I don’t think USA will get it) it will be the biggest sub tree in game
well is it not a challenger?
It was never called it in German hands no.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
SK would be a TT with NK in it, a combined tree. So SK won’t go to Japan or US
4 Likes
i believe they already said north and south korea will get their own tree. could be wrong tho
2 Likes
ehh doubt it SA is still the largest and most unique of any sub tree only having 2 vehicles that are copy paste (eml 90 and the gripen)
yet its still a challenger though?
1 Like
A few as event vehicles or premiums is fine. But we don’t need any subtrees
2 Likes
Won’t India be bigger Sub tree?
Even then didn’t it receive a different arms config from the other Gripen Cs?