mostly to secure vehicles that rightfully belong in the US tree anyways
very true.
this exists
2 Likes
Basically just saying you were wrong calling it challanger times like 5
Japan is just becoming a sub tree when it gets south k (I don’t think USA will get it) it will be the biggest sub tree in game
well is it not a challenger?
It was never called it in German hands no.
SK would be a TT with NK in it, a combined tree. So SK won’t go to Japan or US
4 Likes
i believe they already said north and south korea will get their own tree. could be wrong tho
2 Likes
ehh doubt it SA is still the largest and most unique of any sub tree only having 2 vehicles that are copy paste (eml 90 and the gripen)
yet its still a challenger though?
1 Like
A few as event vehicles or premiums is fine. But we don’t need any subtrees
2 Likes
Won’t India be bigger Sub tree?
Even then didn’t it receive a different arms config from the other Gripen Cs?
Again in German hands no. It was the 130mm mbt
even then the Eland and Panhard have distinct visual differences. primarily the engine deck
lets be so real rn israel should have been a sub tree
but it is a challenger still
That wasn’t what I said. This is a much more niche requirement than what I said they had.
10.7 is a far more expansive and popular British ground lineup. Hence why more attackers have been focused there, unlike 9.7 which doesn’t have a huge amount and only really came to be more recently.
Suggestions are always welcome for new vehicles in the appropriate area.
1 Like
USA is getting left behind in the sub trees Britain will get India too thats just insane USA just gets good ol USA but when they need spaa they get Norway spaa that Sweden should really have
Where? because the us doesnt really need a sub tree at all.