because the US is in no need of sub trees? like i dont get why US players want a sub tree, they boast about all of their additions but then still want a sub tree even though it add s nothing to them as the only Sub trees that make sense for the US mainly use US / analogues to US equipment meaning it adds nothing new
1 Like
All of australias vehicles other than that AIM were already in the british tree.
and australia is finally a full on Subtree, which it should have been from the start.
1 Like
Sometimes we even get folders for vehicles with next to no relation
the great thing about foldered vehicles is that if you have no interest in playing them you can skip them
i want them because there are unique traits they dont share with other models of the same plane ie the typhoon NF mk1b has a radar
if sub trees aren’t messy then tell me why austraila has 2 12.0 tank squadrons with the name m1a1 and the other one m1a1 aim in 2 did major trees
separate problem
tbf that comes from gaijins rules on having to only research 3 vehicles in a line to progress to the next rank
idk i just guessed
the challenger hull on that style turret just looks so damn cool (not as good as the streetfighter though)
because australia is rightfully a british subtree
canada is definitely amess being spread between 3 different trees
not even the worst one in the brit tree
3 Likes
I guess, still a bit funny to me
@Smin1080p_WT now the aussie M1A1 AIM is officially in the british tree is there a possibility of the american sqaudron one being changed from an aussie AIM to the USMC AIM actually used by the americans?
Thats neat part, they never called it a Challenger 130 or similar.
(Directly below this they embed the demo-video btw)
Also at the bottom of the same page:
Hey, I think I know that place! Kinda where they modified and tested the vehicle.
I firmly believe we can indeed go worse
1 Like
because as smin said earlier they often add a squadron vehicle from the nation they plan to add to that tree? hence the M1A1 AIM going to the british tree as a squadron tank, also US mains would have cried if it was added as just a tech tree tank
1 Like
i have no idea what any of this proves
Why would we ever need a subtree? There’s an unbelievable amount of vehicles still missing from the US. (Especially light tanks)
they should have kept the 5th line as the SA / Sub tree line
yes I thought he said to put it in the tree that the teaser vehicle was added in?
Clearly it’s a British program because it’s a challenger and not a independent German program unrelated to the British