Again in German hands no. It was the 130mm mbt
even then the Eland and Panhard have distinct visual differences. primarily the engine deck
lets be so real rn israel should have been a sub tree
but it is a challenger still
That wasn’t what I said. This is a much more niche requirement than what I said they had.
10.7 is a far more expansive and popular British ground lineup. Hence why more attackers have been focused there, unlike 9.7 which doesn’t have a huge amount and only really came to be more recently.
Suggestions are always welcome for new vehicles in the appropriate area.
1 Like
USA is getting left behind in the sub trees Britain will get India too thats just insane USA just gets good ol USA but when they need spaa they get Norway spaa that Sweden should really have
Where? because the us doesnt really need a sub tree at all.
buddy india is 5 vehicles and from the looks of it might just make it to 6 by the end of the year lol
too big
Vickers mk7 is a leopard I don’t see it in Germany? Or even called a leopard
Oh, you meant vehicles currently in game, my bad
The “Challenger 130” name is something people made up, not something Rheinmetall ever called it.
It also has virtually nothing to do with Challenger developments and the integration of the autoloader + gun was a private venture that the UK government didnt “order” nor funded.
The original vehicle was modified and tested in germany (RWM, Unterlüss). All of the footage used in the demo-video was taken on their firing range in Unterlüss.
As per suggestion-rules, germany is the country that this vehicle would fall into.
(Private Venture [for suggstions] means that whichever country that the company that made it is from, is applicable. In this case, its absurdly clear that it was Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH (RWM), which is a german company [if them modifying and testing it in germany didnt make that clear enough])
yeah it got the same treatment the EFTs got of shared technical capabilities otherwise the SA gripen would have been useless and not even 13.0
1 Like
Only if the UK tree got flooded with USSR slop, which a lot of us brit mains REALLY DONT WANT.
Id play USSR for USSR vehicles, and i do. There is some very good indian modifications of british stuff like their folland gnats were incredible and they have some unique things too like the Tejas (a better rafale with how WT works) or the disaster of a tank that is Arjun (coming this year)
because the vickers mk7 as built for british intent as a challenger 1 replacement, this challenger 1300 or rheinmetall defence 130mm gun testbed or whatever was simply to test a new gun not to replace an entire tank.
i would count giving them a tank as funding it, stops germany from having to build something entirely new from the ground up
that was a leo 2 hull bought by Vickers to put their own turret on as a challenger 1 competitor.
different thing to the 130mm mounted on a challenger hull. Both belong in britain tho
We dont have any current plans to change it no. It will remain as is.
long story short the Challenger 130mm should be in both germany and britain as its a german testbed built off a british tank
1 Like
Borrowed from Germany. That’s why the program later got shut down
I want to know where your logic is for this. Because it’s the same situation but one tank is German
well that is unfortunate, it would take confusion away from players wondering what nation australia goes to wwhile taking nothing aay from the american tt as from what i know other than the round the M1A1 AIM’s are practically the same as eachother