I ate them :3
Did you eat the domestic rounds as well?
fair enough a more reasonable answer then most germans give on the topic
they used tthe 3TD hull or the 2LEP hull for it so i would’ve guessed we wanted to see how it would work for future challenger 3 plans but thats just a guess
he probably meant a good cas aircraft
Again, point out where Rheinmetall called it that.
this has to be bait right this cant be your actual opinion
Not at all. They used the challenger 2 LEP chassis because it was already modified to fit the 130 (part that was needed for the chally 3 program) and at that time rheinmetall didn’t have a leopard ready to fit the 130 without major modifications
not bait I’m dead serious we have australian vehicles in USA and now Britain its a mess
Britain has absolutely nothing comparable or equivalent to 2 x fire and forget mavericks at 9.7 in ground.
The lowest BR FnF munitions Britain gets are 3x Martels on the 10.3 Buccaneer, and the lowest mavericks are on the 10.7 Hawk 200. Currently British CAS at 9.x has to try and compete with Mavericks using Bullpups and dumb bombs.
for this reason we get 2 m1a1 squadron vehicles for australia in 2 dif major trees
im not to knowledgeable on it ill be fr but i pray brittain gets it because it looks so damn cool
britain is a mess because of how?
not really as if im not mistaken Australian vehicles in the future would be going to the UK and I would assume Canada as well since there are more Canadian and Australian vehicles in the british tree then any other tree
1 Like
German tanks always look cool :3 but it’s just a basic challanger nothing special the " addon armour" was likely just sheet metal
but why is Britain getting m1a1 squadron and USA had one for some time now its like Gaijin is just moving on from giving USA any sub trees
there are unique modifications of existing aircraft that aren’t in the game I.E: P40 N/M and typhoon N.F mk1 b etc. not everything is about meta btw that’s a sad way to look at games imo.
so it wont change much why would u want it , it looks the same too
no i would 1000% call putting a vehicle that under any normal circumstance would be in X tree because thats where its from in Y tree, controversial.