No? It was a German project to test the 130 and compare it to the french asclon. The British allowed it because well they wanted to see how the 130 would fit or something.
The LEP was British the chally 130 was german
no.
1 Like
no thats what folders are for
1 Like
We dont announce a full sub tree until its ready to be shown or talked about in more detail.
Again, the same as the Indian T-90 and Thai F-5 too that preceeded their sub trees.
The only exceptions being what we dicuss in CM disclosures regarding larger and longer term plans. Like Greece, Singapore etc.
It wasn’t added to take the F-86Ks spot? It was to help provide Germany with more CAS / AGM-65 carriers and a decent squadron vehicle. We made this clear at the time.
As mentioned above, we have already talked aboit Greece far ahead of time more recently. That also has had the opposite effect of what you described of people being upset its not here already. So it goes both ways.
It wasn’t really a “controversy” and no it did not. Getmany already had Argentine vehicles before it got the Swiss Hunter. It was decided long before that.
2 Likes
ahh yes then Gaijin better start buying folders we will need hundreds
unless you have something stating that it wasnt a contender for the LEP then idk what to say as I have seen mention that it was so again unless you have a statement that it wasnt
pretty sure we allowed it because it would help us decide weather we go for the L/55 on the Challenger 3 or a 130MM aswell
1 Like
they already exist and serve the purpose of housing similar vehicles
1 Like
Not every squadron vehicle is indicative of a sub tree. For example the Leopard 2PL. Poland is not a German sub tree.
Just there have been some lead examples. (T-90, Hunter, F-5 etc)
6 Likes
but it was another thing that went against what the community wanted (like the F-14D being premium the implementation of the KH38MT etc) which could be considered a controversy
can Rafale fully sustain a 5g turn (0 energy loss) at 35-40k ft at mach 1.7?
most likely
Girl… It was never for the LEP or chally 3 program and it’s pretty clear who lead it too it literally being called rheinmetall defense 130mm testbed (no challanger in the name) and the fact rheinmetall was the only company on the side of the tank and even it was tested IN GERMANY
shouldn’t Canada be in USA tree?
1 Like
The 130mm was never in consideration for today it’s a consideration for in 10 years or whenever it’s needed to be able to fit the 130mm without many issues
Nahh, clearly the Testing range in Unterlüß is clearly in the UK :3
I am still coping for the PL-12!!!
Why?
Clearly that’s such a British name as well
ik they exist tell me how a new prop varient will change your game play for props and the prop meta?