It’s hard to say since there are nations which are “currently placed” in certain TTs, but not officially called “subtrees”, what will happen to them in the future is not clear.
Imo we will probably see more subtrees help for Chinese air/ground and Swedish air TTs in the nearest future, since they are full TTs, but still lacking 5th lines, plus lower part of Japanese 5th ground line.
Commonwealth tree?
There’s only a handful that could go to Sweden, I’d say realistically one more subtree but a few could be argued, I’m looking at you Eesti, the jokes about them wanting to be Nordic are numerous lmao, I’d mainly wanna see the swedish vehicles they used and modified, same with some of the terrangbils from Latvia iirc, if anything they should go to a baltic state tree or wherever they want but in the end it’s the snails choice
Great success
Effectively, the UK tree is just waiting for Canada and New Zealand to join South Africa, India and Australia in having a home in the UK tree.
As for the idea of a “commonwealth tree,” if you ask me, it’s dumb, as the Commonwealth is made up of 56 nations, many of which don’t get along with each other (along with there not being enough room for the unquie/doemstic vehclie of all the nations). Smaller trees like CAN-ANZAC would be ideal, as they give all the nations more than enough room over stuffing 4+ nations that need 2-3 lines each at minimum into the max 5 lines a tree can have, or RR&DS holy grail: the sub-tree rework.
I know it is never going to happen but i want a Australia tree like Israel
1 Like
An Australian tree would be nice (tho they had domestic vehicles in WW2, so half a tree would be dumb). I’d prefer a separate tree for each of the major Commonwealth players: UK, ANZACS, ZA, Canada, India (each on its own tree, but that’s more then somewhishfull thinking).
Sadly do to the ANZACs’ weak ground (seen by the sub-tree suggestion), something like these would most likely be needed for them. Tho it also helps Canada’s shortcomings.
1 Like
Today is the Chinese’s Day of the Dead, not a good day for us. So that is the reason There are so many funeral photo of bvvd.
I know exactly what they are saying, indeed crossed the line.
But I have to say, Chinese people are curse master.
2 Likes
Not sure what could Estonia bring to Swedish air TT, plus it was a part of SU, so only modern stuff is possible. That probably would be a line of more Norwegian and Danish planes, with a certain level of copypaste like Gladiators, Spitfires, Sabres, F-104G and etc (maybe a few Capronies XD).
Idk about top tier though, maybe just more F-16s.
Oh boy do I have the best thing to ever exist 1 sec
Literally only 2x 7mm mgs but it’s neat so I want it in game in some form
1 Like
yeah, why not)
As far as Eesti is concerned they also use a few modded swedish ships and also
CV9035NL with the armor mods can go to Sweden lol, or gaijin spreads the love of the CV90 to the baltic states with more CVs
They’ll just give it to the Soviets 🥀
Doubtful, if so then the Soviets clearly can only design inferior IFVs and need Swedish ones to compensate.
Now if they didn’t have any IFVs it’d be different but at that point it’s just more sad for the USSR lol
Wait maybe gaijin would actually fix them
Also tbf with that logic then Germany should have france, Poland, ect ect which I don’t see happening.
So we shouldn’t expect the teaser trailer this Friday correct??? Next?
First or second week of Sept more than likely
1 Like
I don’t expect them this week (would love to be surprised); I do, however, see it happening next week at the earliest.
Ment the plane girlie. As it was captured by the Soviets in the invasion
Eh, then so would the BT-42 as those also got captured but uh, I don’t see a Soviet BT-42 (probably because they didn’t get used in service same with a one off prototype)
Same with the Maus also lol
Not like the Soviets had a functional prototype lol