I just wanna be able to BVR. People are saying use the C for range but they don’t understand by the time the Gripen E reaches a high enough speed for 40KM I’d be fired at already. I DONT need higher range missile I just need the ONLY missile that is capable of saving its speed and managing its throttle the entire flight to its target. And that is the Meteor. They can nerf the range to balance but it’s not fair how they get the AIM 120C and are able to BVR meanwhile the C is practically useless on the Gripen E unless you get up to 10K height and atleast Mach 1.7 and fire for it to hit at 40KM. And once again by the time I’m doing that due to my lack of thrust I’d be fired at already. The Meteor fixes that problem since it manages its burn time and throttle. Don’t hate me for this but I wanna BVR like others not having to get fucked in the ass while trying to reach a high speed and altitude for me to fire.
@Piciu713 good evening; ; one month ago gaijin had plans for changing the SPYDER, now that the provisional BR changes are out & there’s still no mention of SPYDER (BR/ordnance), is there anything you could forward us about gaijin’s goal with it? thank you!

But the point is, if they give Meteor to the Gripen E, they also give it to the Rafale and Typhoon. What would change?
Then give it to them atleast it’s balanced and everyone can BVR. I’m not dickriding any nation I just want every nation to actually be balanced and BVR. I don’t wanna have to wait till 30KM in the meantime some dick head fired 4 missiles at me and notch and by the time I’m in a notch someone else will fire at me.
Well next gen ir missile might come sooner than i thought. Moving F-18E to 14.7 might mean it would get AIM-9X next update? But that won’t make any sense if F-15C GE is at 14.3 when even that could receive 9X and is better than F-18E.
Well they did mess up BR of few vehicle especially F-15A.
And there goes my T-80A dreams with the replacement of T-64B at rank VII.
Would have been a cool 11.0
Nice letter E there. Dropped my rant
F-18C being grouped with F-18A got very angry. More angry than they moving F-18E to 14.7. Why did they have to group it. IT TOOK ME 420K(or 410k i don’t remember) RP TO GRIND IT AND NOW IT WOULD BE HALF THE RP >:(
It’s like a swift but hard kick to the groin every time. If they weren’t so money hungry and gave us some long overdue economy improvements like an RP bank they could just let us bank the difference in RP after stuff like this.
Some groupings are truly “We are seeking player benefits” advertisements. Same can be said about the F-5TH / F-16 grouping.
Just keep those 3 vehicle per rank lines as it is.
Yeah, same for the F-16A OCU (now grouped with the F-5TH). But honestly the less RP people have to spend on the worst implemented F-16 in game, the better.
At least I got it sooner for the added price, even if it’s miserable outside of that time we got the bullet hell event
Why are they moving the early F-15s down in BR?
Do they seriously not know how much worse the compression is getting every time they move high BR vehicles down in BR?
Also, great, they are getting rid of the APDS on the Falcon while leaving its BR unchanged
This is actually a very good idea
But at least they could give back the extra RP the player grinded before they got grouped. This extra RP could be use to grind some other vehicle
Early F-15A’s at 12.7 with AIM-7M and AIM-9M when the F-14A is stuck with AIM-7F and AIM-9H at the same BR is astounding.
F-15s destroyer of worlds at 12.7 lmaoooo
If any devs are looking here any chance you got anymore of whatever it is you’re smoking with some of these changes? Asking for a friend

