Along with Ki-148 you can add Ki-147 for Ki-67 and hypothetically for G8N
5 Likes
its just what’s harming the game and it sucks
still think my favourite change is when they make a change (normally a nerf) they wont cite the source they used for it and if you want to change it you need multiple primary sources stating the original change is wrong lol
3 Likes
wouldnt put it past gaijin making it a single value
yeah idk how gaijin thinks the armour from a tank from the 2020s somehow didnt improve the from the 90s, im waiting for the challenger 3P to have same armour as the challenger 2 from the 90s as well lmao
6 Likes
-
Leopards 2A7Vs still have spall linears? And yet even if it is underperforming in the armor section, is not completely dominant enough to rule as the best tank in the game? Again, internal armor changes are hard to predict what the upgrade is.
-
How do you expect them to buff something when there is like 0 info on how the armor got reworked or a new package of armor. If there was additional information that due to so n so the armor is quite stronger sure. They could make a reasonable guesstimate.
Other than these 2, back to jets. Flight models to rcs (like for F-117 which has a very very decent rcs headon, working against even modern aesa radars in game) are all based on simulations.
It’s most likely gonna be a set number solution
There will be a number for the plane while its bay is closed and one for while its bay is opened
If they apply the same logic as they use for the RAH-66, the external hardpoints won’t even make a difference
The heat signatures are probably going to be completely screwed up (F-5C levels of stupidity, if I had to guess)
1 Like
I can already see the next CR3 also using a mismatched damage model lmao
1 Like
Pretty much does, generally 3 different rcs values are in front side and rear. Much better than dcs slop which actually uses 1 value.
It will probably make stratergies using stealth much different in future (if gaijin cooks with their aerial warfare mode)
probably lol, I still remember their dumb solution to make the harriers work which ended up making the thrust on seahawks insane it was kinda funny, im still waiting for helicopters in general to have their rotors take into account for their radar signature
2 Likes
Afaik the current stealth Implementation doesn’t factor in side and rear aspects
It does
its still so dumb that the challenger 3TD got a new damage model, then when we asked for the challenger 2s to get the same model or a rework they instead give the 3TD the 2s model which doesnt even line up with the actual model its so funny
1 Like
why bother with effort into that when you can shove out 30 prems
1 Like
I can’t test it myself currently, so I’ll have to take your word for it lol
we have had the EC mode in WT for years but they refuse to make that an actual game mode outside of sim I have very little hope that mode will be good (waiting for the giant maps with dynamic objectives and they only give you a single life)
3 Likes
Putting SAMs on the frontline would force bvr and SEAD at the start.
Multiple objectives will spread out the players
If they model it well, we may finnaly escape the trash furball meta, and stealth will actually become relevant other than just being easy plane to evade fox 3
Its values are literally in datamines
im just hoping they ditch the terrible one life mechanic since it just causes people to only dog fight instead of doing the other objectives since the match ends before you can normally complete the other objectives
Im not holding my breath.
We havent gotten a new Air Sim map in 3 years… im not expecting Aerial warfare anytime soon or it be anything other than a buggy one sided mess
1 Like
I’m not saying every commonwealth vehicle who fits that bill should come, it was mainly to inform the misinformation spreaders on the bases of “X vehicles should always come to X tree because X made it”
1 Like