There should be more vehicle types in general.
The light-medium-heavy-TD-AA categories aren’t enough for all the edge cases
2 Likes
yeah but saying there are no tow carriers at all in the US tree is just wrong that was what I was pointing out
1 Like
There are sub-types, ATGM Carrier is one of them.
They also differentiate between SPAA and SAM in-game.
Edit: just checked, apparently they don’t differentiate those ingame, I could have sworn they did at some point tho
The roles just exist to balance spawn costs and to restrict the ability to use artillery anyways, so adding more roles wouldn’t necessarily change anything
Fair
tbh I would argue the ML is more OP then the MT due to being able to fire from the airfield with out even needing airspeed or altitude
Yeah, but that is at least a little niche in its use.
I tried to play a top tier SIM match a few days ago. Our entire team was dead within second between a combo of MI-28NMs and Su-30s.
1 Like
But, but…
3 Likes
Suuuure…
I’ll believe that when I see it, otherwise infantry is just a new vessel to pour resources into that could be used for other more important things
3 Likes
“What do you mean you want new maps for ground, air and naval, we’ve just released 15 new infantry maps, arent those good enough?”
2 Likes
“Look at all these guns we’ve added for infantry!”
(each gun counts as a seperate “vehicle”)
3 Likes
Yeah but, waiting for the launcher to deploy on a 6000 sqft house isn’t exactly what I meant.
Yes, TOW HMMWV and Jeep with TOW would be good start.
I’m more of a ATGM Stryker type of guy, but all ATGM carriers are good additions in my book
3 Likes
They have those?
Who, the US?
The M1134 is the TOW launcher variant of the Stryker, isn’t it? They operate those.
1 Like
Higher BR LAV-ATM?
Dunno, I just know that it’s a thing
4 Likes
LAV-AT and LAV-ATM are good options as well. The Stryker one would be cool. Speaking of Strykers, Sgt. Stout and Dragoon when? Hell, when will US get a wheeled IFV?
2 Likes
not even close to this power level twin
2 Likes