Remember Alvis made some for MOWAG, specifically a 25mm and 25mm/TOW versions.
I want to see funny looking vehicle added
4 Likes
FYI your first image of a “SU-30MKK” with PL-12’s is a J-16 with PL-15’s and PL-10’s
And the last 2 images are of SU-30MK2’s only the second image has a MKK
These are MKK’s
1 Like
Much agree
Australian P-43D might be your answer (Its pending rn). These look like squished P-47 meaning cursed in their own right
Dont forget this thing
Very excited for the MV-22B suggestion being passed. (And hopefully turn up in the game at some point)
Would be very limited with it’s armament of either 2 Hydra/APKWS rocket pods or 2 AGM-176 missiles and a 7.62 GAU-17 turret along with AN/ALE-47 CM dispensers and potentially DIRCM so it won’t be completely defenceless. Would be more of a collectors addition, crap but still cool as hell to see in-game.
I just hope we actually do see it and it doesn’t end up like the ACH-47.
1 Like
They realized the only realistic naval planes are MiG-29s and are doing everything in their power to not add one
1 Like
Funnily enough, damage visuals were MUCH closer to this back in the times of Birds of Prey, Birds of Steel and Early War Thunder.
They changed it to be much less invasive at some point in the last few years for some reason.
Then there’s lso the fact that all planes die SO easily and quickly upon being hit once or twice, so there isn’t much chance to see them flying damaged on the first place.
This is exactly my Conspiracy Theory…when it comes to missiles and the addition of new ones, the old ones get toned down to make the new set feel much better when added. I’ve played Thousands of games in the Flankers and have noticed the IRCCM of the 73 become a Joke when the target starts using counters multiple seconds After you fire, in shots that should have an fov that would not see the counters at all!
1 Like
I dont think so, rather it has to do with the fact that players have grown and adapted to these missiles, which btw was added 841 days ago. its not completely impossible to flare these missiles even in a close range rear aspect shot if you flare correctly
I’m off to work atm…but I will get clips later and I’m sure even you will scratch your head my Friend!
M47 (90 mm) for italy when?, we need a tank at that br.
1 Like
As I believe replied to you before in other threads the supersonic Cd0 value is the one in concern. Su30SM2 should have wayyyyy more drag as a significantly larger plane.
Also just asking how do u get this series of stats?
Hi, regarding the F-35 suggestion: I understand this is “just” a suggestion, however including only one variant for some countries when multiple variants are in operational service is limiting.
Italy has operated both the A and B variants for years, both fully operational and deployed. Japan, while initially operating only the A, has begun integrating the B. As of today, both nations have A and B in service.
When real, operational variants exist, representing only one does not reflect real-world service. The USA, of course, operate all three variants (A, B, and C) and should be represented as such.
Supersonic would be higher on Su-30SM2 as well, because 2 engines are producing far more thrust for a lower speed.
So yeah, the Su-30SM2’s supersonic drag is likely correct as well.
If J-10C had Su-30SM2’s supersonic drag, it wouldn’t even reach mach 1.2 if it went supersonic at all.
WTRTI setting gives drag from localhost.
Suggestions are not vehicle announcements.
Just because a suggestion is only one variant doesn’t change the fact Gaijin will likely add them to all applicable tech trees when they’re ready for release. [As per their Q&A and statements made previously.]
Yep the drag is correct after a bug report went up for top speed and deck alt speed, all the 30SM variants (SM,MKM) were adjusted to it.
So Nah, the 30sm variants dont need higher drag. Thats imaginary drag if people think for whatever reason it should have higher drag.
Hello
The variants / operators passed is not relevant. Its just a suggestion topic. Suggestions being passed do not mean only that variant or only that nation may be considered or planned. Or at all in some vehicles cases.
6 Likes
Hallo,
Question, are there any more sub-TT’s planned for Italy, since Rank VII and Rank VIII ground forces are pretty lacking content wise compared to other nations, especially Rank VIII.
And when can we expect Hungary WWII Air to be implemented after 3 years?