Germany needs a reconnaissance tank above the BR 11.0… why not the Puma SP1?
Because:
A: whats an Puma SP1?
B: We have the Tracked Boxer RCT 120 for that
I’ve a better idea xP
1 Like
Whats wrong with the PUMA VJTF?
multiple things, with no fixes in sight. idk how a new buggy vehicle would be better tho.
The Spike Lock bug haunts me every time i play it, i think they fixed the tracks taking a vacation when you get ammo racked, it could be more survivable at top tier if it had its spall liner.
And it doesn’t just affect the Puma, it happens with the MMP on the Jaguar, and with the IRIS-T SLM as well(it might not be the same bug), it locks target but you just can’t fire.
Wanna trade for TOWs on the DW?
I think there are Su30SM2 with the the AL41F1S…all of them no, some of them Yes! Yeah Yeah I know AI…there are articles about it though!
and this was in 2022…by now how many have the better engines???
3 Likes
The AL41F1S puts out 14,500 kgf. The AL31FM1 on the 27SM puts out 12,520 kgf it’s less by 1,980 kgf. The extra thrust from the AL41s will stop the 30SM from falling out of the sky when it does it’s high AoA stuff…don’t believe me??? Give the 30SM a 4660 kgf buff to its total kgf out put and you wont fall out of the sky when you do this.
1 Like
@D4nger_CLO5E
Comparing in-game installed thrust to an entirely different context is known as a false equivalence fallacy.
The AL31FM1 engine produces 13,527kgf in the comparison you’re seeking.
The difference is less than that of the F-18E and F-18C engines, especially accounting for weight.
Giving the Su-30SM engine thrust it doesn’t have IRL isn’t going to happen.
The fact is ~2000kgf more thrust total won’t overcome the 7.43% more fuel needed, and 2130kg of empty mass increase.
The Su-30SM weighs more than Su-27SM and produces more drag, it will need far more than a 7.43% thrust improvement [and fuel consumption increase] to overcome the drag & weight gains.
The 30SM and 30SM2 are the same airframe…no extra internal fuel, the engines are just much more efficient giving it extra range…was using the SM as a comparison because it is the closest thing to the SM2…if added, more like when added the 30SM2 will be a decent flight performance upgrade to the SM that’s all I’m saying if you don’t think so that’s ok. Well have to see what Gaijin does.
@D4nger_CLO5E
I’m glad we agree about Su-30SM and SM2 being the same airframe.
However, that’s not relevant to my post.
I mean the jaguar only is at the same lvl as the puma as well.
Only main caliber lights likely are above the 11.0 mark.
Exceptiom hsvtl with a big medium caliber auto cannon
Today CM QnA?
I wouldn’t hold my breath
Even once it comes.
I wouldnt bet on it having actual useful information.
It was a QNA from youtibe wasnt it?
1 Like
Dev blog when?
My man slide those postfx settings haha, they look amazing.
1 Like
Yes:
Accepted
Suggestion
Sadly most were written in the old forum which is now gone.
But, the MUSS, JUST ADD AN SINGLE 0 in the MUSS code to increase its detection range they copied the code from an Hard Kill APS, issue, they forgot to change the detection range, Only god knows how an IRCM system is supposed to work when it starts only at 250m because someone didnt came to the Idea, I might have to add an 0 to it for it to work…
The Finnish one does not have direct fire sights