Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Game Discussion General Discussion
848

Any chance we’ll see something like the Mistral or Aquilon for France? Rank 5 air feels so empty

1 Like
849

I think the F-15EX will appear sooner then any gap fillers for France.

2 Likes
850

It’s a message from the gods

1 Like
851

Just for the record, please don’t add Apache from whatever nation to Italy🙏
we will better wait more for AW249.

852

@Smin1080p_WT
What happend with the old forum posts?
Are they still archived at Gaijin? Because a lot of vehicles aren’t on this forum yet.

1 Like
853

I mean, there is an little difference between gaving am nation 8x Spikes/PARS with max 8km range, and gaving an nation 16x 16km Fire and Forget weapons

4 Likes
854

Yo me the funniest and saddest part is the bug reports hahah.

We have unfixed bug reports so old that they were first made in the Old Forums’ bug report section, and now they are lost.

855

Yeah, but the same goes for a lot of Japanese vehicles, from which the sources are really rare and sometimes unobtainable due to them being books.

@Smin1080p_WT
You guys have them saved right?

856

Glad to see you back, congratulations on the honeymoon by the way! How was it and did you go anywhere nice? (If you don’t mind us asking lol).

857

Honeymoon? Wait no one told me that smin and bvvd got together daaamn

858

That’s so sad, they’d rather push the meta than improve existing tiers
Ranks 5-6 need love

1 Like
859

When do the British ground TT changes come into effect? Will it be with the next major update or will it come when the TT skips for new vehicles close and become permanent?

860

Not just these ranks. Japan needs love from rank I untill VI.
Japan has been implemented in the game since 2016, yet still has a 4 line ground TT, with the exclusion of the recently added 2 Thai vehicles which are in a “new” line. The fith line only has 3 vehicles in it, yet it can be filled with all domestic Japanese vehicles.

Instead, they add lazy C&P, while the current C&P variants weren’t even used by the nation, e.g. M60TTS with the ERA and M163 without VADS.

I’d much rather see the STA-4 and other STA variants being added, along with the dozen SPRG variants and SPH’s that Japan still has to offer.

5 Likes
861

Overall the whole game needs to be fleshed out everywhere, both in terms of vehicles, game mechanics and others things like nation folders and battle ratings. But no, surely it’s better to push the meta before the previous one is even remotely balanced

1 Like
862

Well, looking at GB. They have more vehicles and mechanics then Germany at the moment. So IMHO, they have plenty of content.
GB, RU, DE and the US really don’t need more content.
Nations like Israël, Japan, China and Italy need more content. Sweden and France just need more air and unique designs.

2 Likes
863

Tbh I don’t even mind major nations getting more content as long as it’s unique, the problem is they keep being fed copypaste while they lack a ton of vehicles they operated… look, usa for example still has no voodoo, no delta dagger, no tech tree and no tech tree drumstick, makes no sense.
But yeah minor nations definitely need more love than major ones

864

The ones being fed C&P aren’t the major nations. The minor nations are being fed C&P and sometimes much later from when the vehicle in question was added.

With the previous update it was like: “Let’s give the US and M55! Hey these other nations used these too, let’s give them that vehicle as well and call it a day!”.

Which resulted in these other nations not receiving a unique vehicle. Hell, look at BeNeLux. The PZH2000 was added a few updates ago - The Netherlands uses the PZH2000 as well, but didn’t get it.
In the near future, France will get the C&P PZH2000 and not something else/unique.

3 Likes
865

Same goes for China. Gaijin keeps recycling tank chassis instead of adding something new.
E.g. ZTZ chassis.

Instead of adding something like this:

Spoiler
866

It ended up being the M60A3 TTS with modifications for ERA (removed turret stowage and handrails, raised smoke launchers), same as the ROC M60A3 TTS. In reality both of these tanks are the same, meaning they now both share the same inaccuracies.
Instead of fixing existing problems they decided that now 2/3 M60A3 TTS being wrong is somehow a good move.

For the M163 it’s even worse, since Thailand never had the base M163, only the M163A1. So the vehicle we got is just entirely ahistorical.

6 Likes
867

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.