thats not a reason thats an excuse like i said, the devs added tons of weapons to 1 single nation before and 1 single nation reciving that 1 single powerfull weapon didnt stop them of adding it, A.K.A KH-38s just a little example. and yes i would always disagree because everything that comes from the devs is always an excuse always is a “BUT” and not an “IF”, never a “if we add it to those 2 nations, we can balance the things out”, “if the rafale have %68 of winrate why not let just add this for “x” nations to stop the imbalance”, “if the sufa is the only 14.0 with 6 missile why not just let it have a missile that can deal with the straight dominance of the rafale” and the list of “ifs” goes on. soo… no this is not a reason its an excuse because 2-3 nations reciving a missile never stoped the devs before specially when those nations are the big ones, soo… do me a favor tell the devs that they should stop messing with us with are not braindead monkeys we see all the things that are happening in the game everyday and we keep analyzing them and we keep giving you a feedback, a work that the devs should be doing too and not only us because if they were doing the job that the players do this type of answers from them would not be given to us.
Agreed
or instead being asked if trophy is being fixed for 500th time
Seems it almost all. 2 or 3 vehicles more. And i expect something really trash…
That… that doesn’t look like frustration.
yea it isnt supposed to be frustration (i think)
My GE are kinda running out
All the people who had a problem w/ it coming out of the bushes to complain
Is it possible to get rid of some rude and inactive staff as well? I have asked Mr Stona before; he said I can report them for inactivity or rudeness, but how do I report them if they either decide to delete the forums because of their “mistake”…?
They hate the M1A2T being added to the Chinese TT because of Chinese PPL… I don’t even believe they would like to use it…
Usually, the full list includes some new mechanics, weapons, and other things that we will see in the future.
it is the full list tho?
custom missions can be made and a lot of people tested the Python-4 in the practice those 2 IRCCM means nothing the FOV IRCCM its literally useless and you know why? its because the seeker just shrinks to 1.2 degrees the circle is still big enough to keep seeing all the countermaasures around the aircraft, practically useless, at the end of the day the only decent and funtional one in the Python-4 would be the seeker shut off and we already know that even the seeker shut off can be easily fooled by just staying straight or changing the directions from where the missile comes. the funtionality of the dual IRCCM specially with high degrees field of the view are useless and this was already debunked for people who is dedicated to this and analyzes missile codes.
No
Imagine if they modeled the spall right if only…
If only someone made a bug report…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Zp2toYqL5DRh
why would you say that it isnt? just curious
Because it’s literally written at the end of the list.
If you have an issue with a staff member, then you can PM any Senior moderator from their team or their respective CM lead: Who is who and Reporting Procedure