They hate the M1A2T being added to the Chinese TT because of Chinese PPL… I don’t even believe they would like to use it…
Usually, the full list includes some new mechanics, weapons, and other things that we will see in the future.
it is the full list tho?
custom missions can be made and a lot of people tested the Python-4 in the practice those 2 IRCCM means nothing the FOV IRCCM its literally useless and you know why? its because the seeker just shrinks to 1.2 degrees the circle is still big enough to keep seeing all the countermaasures around the aircraft, practically useless, at the end of the day the only decent and funtional one in the Python-4 would be the seeker shut off and we already know that even the seeker shut off can be easily fooled by just staying straight or changing the directions from where the missile comes. the funtionality of the dual IRCCM specially with high degrees field of the view are useless and this was already debunked for people who is dedicated to this and analyzes missile codes.
No
Imagine if they modeled the spall right if only…
If only someone made a bug report…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Zp2toYqL5DRh
why would you say that it isnt? just curious
Because it’s literally written at the end of the list.
If you have an issue with a staff member, then you can PM any Senior moderator from their team or their respective CM lead: Who is who and Reporting Procedure

where? wdym?
It’s never written in his book, but it’s written in gszabi’s book, and I’m leaning towards it.
“As always, not everything is on leak lists, and some of them can turn out to be premium/event/squadron.” @magach
just means that some vehicles that are gonna be in the update are not included in the leak list,
not that the leak list is not fully out dude
leak lists were never updated after they were released
but yet they just added nerfed the Brimstones just with SAL for balance despite having another mode of guidance and the devs knows about the 2 type of guidance but yet they chose to add it with just one, if the problem is the “dual IRCCM” (which i think its not because i explained how it works) there is no need of adding it with that when with just only one IRCCM the missile will still work hundreds of people agreed on having the Python-4 with just one IRCCM if thats the problem.
Well, we’re talking about the fact that, according to tradition, there’s always an updated list that includes equipment that wasn’t included in the first list.
“according to tradition”? When did that ever happen?
many times
or you can just explain?
fr?
cause i see the leaks only through mike’s server, and it has never been updated there I think