They should add tanks for them but if sweden can have 3 germany can have at least 2. Some nations dont really have an equal tank.
3 Likes
it’s a misreading of built based on M1A1.
all Abrams are build based on storage M1A1.
M1A2T is basically a M1A2 with upgraded electronics but export FMS armor like M1 AIM, and DM43A1 shell
So… every aspect except the main, primary one? Also- not on the Light Tank department either. I wouldn’t say PUMA is near HTSV-L, 2S38, or even Strv 9040C. The ONLY aspect in which Germany truly excels is SAM.
And there’s nothing wrong with that, because there are no options in that field- but there are SO many options in the MBT department that there’s really no reason for Germany not to be on par with Sweden already.
2 Likes
You cleary dont appreciate the spike-casino where you gamble if your weapon hit
2 Likes
AA?
CAS?
Helis?
Also the Puma vjtf is definitely better than the CV90 Mk.IV and I would also argue that it’s better than the 9040C.
So yeah Sweden is only better in the sense that it has more uparmored MBTs.
1 Like
Yeah and multiple can be on par or at least a lot closer.
Germany is doing good in all aspects except their teams are absolutely braindead currently.
Have you tried the PARS…? You can launch all 8 of them on a tank and still not kill it.
Eurofighter and its “one-at-a-time-maintained-LOS-lock” missiles while everyone else is launching 12x Fire-and-Forget missiles?
And even then, that’s AIR, not ground. Some ground players actually intend to play ground vehicles. Having good air (if it were even the case) does not justify ground falling behind unneccessarily.
In terms of GROUND vehicles, Germany’s only advantage over Sweden right now is the SAM department.
4 Likes
Love how the chinese was up in arms about Japan getting a VT4 yet they wanna money grub a abrams
9 Likes
Go try an AH-64A (A!) at top tier and tell me with a straight face that it’s better than the UHT.
Wether we like it or not, CAS is part of ground RB.
And like I said, you can make a serious argument that Germany has the better IFV.
Can someone please explain to me the thought proccess of placing Greece and Cyprus in the Israeli tech tree? How does that even make sense? Greek army is comprised of Leopard 1s and 2s, M48s and M60s (In Cyprus), Russian TOR-M1s, BMP-1s and Marders 1A3s so we are practically giving another nation Leopard 2s which in my opinion is kinda laughable since already half of the nations have Leopard 2s already.
I honestly think that using this as an excuse to give the Israeli tech tree access to German armored vehicles is making no sense. If you really want to add Greek and Cypriot lines (which lets be honest, do not exist as Greek, they are simply a mix of American and German vehicles) might as well just do it as an extra tree or somehow include them in the German tech tree just like it is supposed to be done with the Singaporean ones.
3 Likes
13 Likes
So… MMW Brimstone 2s when?
3 Likes
Yugoslavia lets go
I hope WWII Japan ground and air get some love after 4 years.
Still waiting for some very important prototypes in the TT like the Mansyu Ki-98, Ki-91, Ki-93, Ki-73 and Ki-66.
Same for some produced aircraft like the Ki-48, A6M7, A6M8, Ki-51 and G3M.
1 Like
Oplot was suppossed to be love, but… given the poor state of its UFP’s implementation, it feels more like an insult lmao.
Poor thing can’t even withstand the likes of 3BM60, somehow.
7 Likes
Arguably the most fun part along with Anti cas duties if you ask me
2 Likes
I reject the 64A and Prefer an EC-665 Tigre HAD-E in an 12.0 Match (it is better than an Tiger UHT)
Reason:
Improved Engines
You can kill what you want, and not what the game says…
Better mobility is always a plus tbh
Yep, + I like the GIAT more than the M230 )))