Imagine taking the CLAWS and tweak it into a NASAMS HML. Ah, the workload!
I don’t really know anything about planes, I’m talking from a ground perspective. Besides trying to make every single nation have the same capabilities might be a bit hard.
1 Like
Poland can stand alone and strong, and if they need support I’m sure a co-tech tree with Czeckoslovakia could be arranged
Because Israel need gaps filling by a country with a strong military, that being greece for MBTs, AFVs and Aircraft, and Cyprus for variety and SAMs.
Doesn’t get any better with spain bro, Leopard 2HEL and Leopard 2E are practically identical
I’m rather annoyed we are getting yet another half nation, Israel is about to be swarmed by sub trees after what 3 years and before that just gotten really good recent additions so I’m a bit upset that they chosen yet another rank 4 starter nation
4 Likes
If I may ask, what relation do those countries have with Israel? I may not be aware.
Yeah but one would make its own TT to bring more variety (and lots of interesting vehicles in lower tiers) instead of becoming a lame subtree of a poorly implemented nation. Look at Korea for example. I believe it’s an interesting addition but it’s all basically going to be C&P till more modern vehicles drop (like China/Israel). I don’t see why some really interesting nations are gatekept while others are implemented.
Btw Spain-Portugal could fill a full TT in ground, sea and air altogether, unlike some other nations already in game.
That would have made for a quite interesting Top Tier lineup, though.
At least two 2E variants and a 2HEL one- Sweden, but better.
I guess 2HEL will help Israel a bit, the same way 2A7HU helped Italy, though!
3 Likes
What is more interesting is if israel has more subtree vehicles at some ranks than own vehicles. Some tree should be renamed tbh. Sweden → Nordic tree, Germany → DACH tree, Israel → ?eastern mediterianian see tree? (didnt know something better)
Could use the 2A4, 2E (2A6 with more armour) and the 2E Tortuga. Tho I believe the Ministry of Defence has shown plans of modernizing the current 2E with cage armor, if we don’t put the 2A8 into service (which I doubt).
I somewhat agree with this. Nation-TTs made sense before, but it’s all just a cluster of vehicles and nations now, may aswell get rid of national trees altogether (which would also help get rid of some drama).
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT may I ask how the PT-16/T14 mod is doing at 11.0 (According to Statistic) with no TVD and only DM23?
Hope germany at least get some of their uparmored pre 2A7 mbts soon especially if israel gets some.
1 Like
3 Likes
Event vehicle → only veteran players have it → stats really high → gaijin moves it up despite not being suited for that br
The same story for the 2AV. Literally worse than 2A4 in every metric yet only 0.3 br below it. For some reason less armor (and smaller cannon) but same weight if it still isnt fixed
Cool, So I count as Veteran )))
Currently Printing Nuke with it in 12.0 matches its just Nuts xD
I will make a guess. The new SPAA for China will be HQ-16.
1 Like
It’s a 4 year old event vehicle. I would say playing a game for 4 years is veteran.
Ok, there’s something we need to settle;
Is M1A2T a SEPv2 variant, or a SEPv3 one? Because I used to believe the latter, but then was led to believe it’s the former… and now I am too confused to tell lmao. What do we know of it?
Closer to SEP V2 or AIM than the SEP V3, nothing special really
M1a2T is not a SEPv3 it’s Frankenstein Abrams mixed between M1A1SA and M1A2SEPV2. Essentially, it’s an M1A1-type hull with a SEPv2 turret that has export armor.
1 Like