Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Have you tried the PARS…? You can launch all 8 of them on a tank and still not kill it.

Eurofighter and its “one-at-a-time-maintained-LOS-lock” missiles while everyone else is launching 12x Fire-and-Forget missiles?

And even then, that’s AIR, not ground. Some ground players actually intend to play ground vehicles. Having good air (if it were even the case) does not justify ground falling behind unneccessarily.

In terms of GROUND vehicles, Germany’s only advantage over Sweden right now is the SAM department.

4 Likes

Love how the chinese was up in arms about Japan getting a VT4 yet they wanna money grub a abrams

9 Likes

Go try an AH-64A (A!) at top tier and tell me with a straight face that it’s better than the UHT.

Wether we like it or not, CAS is part of ground RB.

And like I said, you can make a serious argument that Germany has the better IFV.

Can someone please explain to me the thought proccess of placing Greece and Cyprus in the Israeli tech tree? How does that even make sense? Greek army is comprised of Leopard 1s and 2s, M48s and M60s (In Cyprus), Russian TOR-M1s, BMP-1s and Marders 1A3s so we are practically giving another nation Leopard 2s which in my opinion is kinda laughable since already half of the nations have Leopard 2s already.
I honestly think that using this as an excuse to give the Israeli tech tree access to German armored vehicles is making no sense. If you really want to add Greek and Cypriot lines (which lets be honest, do not exist as Greek, they are simply a mix of American and German vehicles) might as well just do it as an extra tree or somehow include them in the German tech tree just like it is supposed to be done with the Singaporean ones.

3 Likes

image

13 Likes

So… MMW Brimstone 2s when?

3 Likes

Yugoslavia lets go

I hope WWII Japan ground and air get some love after 4 years.
Still waiting for some very important prototypes in the TT like the Mansyu Ki-98, Ki-91, Ki-93, Ki-73 and Ki-66.
Same for some produced aircraft like the Ki-48, A6M7, A6M8, Ki-51 and G3M.

1 Like

Oplot was suppossed to be love, but… given the poor state of its UFP’s implementation, it feels more like an insult lmao.

Poor thing can’t even withstand the likes of 3BM60, somehow.

7 Likes

Arguably the most fun part along with Anti cas duties if you ask me

2 Likes

I reject the 64A and Prefer an EC-665 Tigre HAD-E in an 12.0 Match (it is better than an Tiger UHT)
Reason:
Improved Engines
You can kill what you want, and not what the game says…

Better mobility is always a plus tbh

Yep, + I like the GIAT more than the M230 )))

Tbh Apaches have always been kinda dead imo. Hellfires are terrible and take far too long to travel and their mobility and BR makes them pretty meh. I hope we get decomp for top tier especially helicopters cause we have far too many helis thatbare garbo at their own tier and others that are very under BRed.

so gaijin is adding a greek and Cypriot subtree to israel,
Does anyone know A SINGLE ORIGINAL VEHICLE IN THAT SUBTREE?


who in gaijin thought it was a good idea to add a subtree which is 100% copy pasted?

6 Likes

Hellfires are still better than PARS )))
Sure, Hellfire isnt Fire and Forget, but atleast you have an good chance of killing the enemy woth rhe 1st Missile, unlike the PARS which prefer to “HIT”

Thats why: TIGRE HAD-E > Tiger UHT :)

Ill take survivability imo, allows me to do more than die getting 1 kill because i had to keep line of sight. Getting in a heli for that much SP and doing essentially nothing is a waste of SP

Additionally you need FnF for top tier now so hellfires are irrelevant

Funfact, when you just mark the area you want to nuke something, you just toss your Hellfire in that direction, and in the last few seconds you come up and Turn on your Laser

Yeah thats a lot of effort to do maybe get a kill. Id be better off getting into a CAS focused jet at that point which again makes Hellfire helis redundant

Korea Tree next update or december ?

1 Like