Do we have clear distinction between 9J and 9N and 9P implemented though? They just be like sharing the same stats
SAAB F-35 wrong name // Issues Community Bug Reporting System mind checking this?
[DEV] F-35 should use Aim 9N-2 // Issues Community Bug Reporting System
This was passed but again given it used 9N-2 i dont see why its allowed to use missiles it didn’t have
There isn’t anything included in the report that shows the name is wrong. Its just the front cover of a manual.
Yeah ill add the page then and update the issue, i only added the model name which is the SAAB 35XD, not home right now ill update it when i can
@Smin1080p_WT Since more and more subs are being considered how come the tab/folder suggestion haven’t been thought up about yet by the devs, like this ground sifting only going to work for a year or so but subs like Thailand will over take the Japanese air tree at top tier which at that point will need it’s own tab within Japan ?
11 Likes
I’ll just take the opportunity and link it for anyone wondering what this is about
15 Likes
At that point get rid of Japan and have the Thailand TT with Japan subtree.
1 Like
At this point make it an ASEAN tree lol
2 Likes
Gaijin, probably - “Too much effort. Here have some Leo 2’s and an F-16”
Thailand is not even close to over take Japans top tiers. In fact, the only “top tier” Jets from Thailand left that could be added are T-50TH, F-16A eMLU and (has yet to be made) Gripen E.
Even though T-50TH hardly counts as top tier, IMO it would be 11.7 in worst case.
5 Likes
Tbh until subtrees are properly reworked this might be a temporary solution for the Chinese controversy. Doesn’t really matter what it’s called anyways.
That being said Japan is the most popular included nation still, and DMM would heavily oppose not having a named “Japan” faction, so it’s probably not realistic
SAAB F-35 wrong name // Issues Community Bug Reporting System
Ive updated it with a bit better name, its not exactly what id like but given im looking for more niche reports since i currently only have 1 secondary soruce for the use of WDNS as a name and more Primary sources specifically referring to the F 35’s getting the WDNS in the 70’s to update them for more modern situations as we lack the original J35F that we see here undergoing trials by SAAB for my home nations airforce.
Additionally we can see the Bullpup which was only available on the earlier F 35 models which the WDNS doesn’t use Additionally it lacks the Ferranti LRMTS on the nose differentiating it from the WDNS/Weapons Delivery and Navigation System.
Har jeg også mulighed for at betale dig og få WDNS flyttet til 10.0 i jorden, tak lol?
honestly this idea is brilliant
Yeah, personally if they DO add an AESA F-15C I think they’d put it behind the E for sure. They can add the E RMP after the current E and then nothing else. The EX could fill that gap. There’s still a couple F-22 variants to add behind the C line
1 Like
This thing will eventually be the most upvoted suggestion in the forums but continue to be ignored because UI does not bring money and they cannot delay indigenous vehicles if copy pasted leopards leave the tree
Yep. 5th line could get some export variants as well possibly, like the F-15K which has an IRST. There’s really a lot of potential, just gotta hope Gaijin doesn’t mess it all up
That’s another possibility, they might put the EX after the C and then do export variants such as the SA/QA or K like you said after the E
2 Likes
Tha would make 0 sense.
Folder under current 15c please
1 Like
I’d say there’s a better chance for it to be seen once it’s specifically passed to the devs.
But until then I hope for it to get to 1000 votes, since that also means more players can help improve and refine it with their feedback to make sure that Gaijin has a good basis to make their implementation on. It’s also just a nice milestone to aim for, and not too unrealistic with some other suggestions having multiple thousand votes.
And we're already over 3/4 of the way there!
I said “ish”