More like General Dynamics design or mowag piranha if you want to be really specific
2 Likes
and why not?
Find me a picture of the Hellfire mounted on it. Real one, not render
Oh Canada is now a British sub-tree?
The Marines use LAV-25 which is based on LAV 2, and the army uses Stryker which are basically LAV 3
1 Like
I mean if we wanna get into semantics I could mention the KH38MT lol but im gonna be honest im not even sure if the hellfire would be worth it since its slower and would probably deal less damage in game
Which is based of the Swiss Piranha by GD.
1 Like
So the LAV-AD should be german
2 Likes
General Dynamics, US defense contractor
I think that goes into the issue germans have with getting another certain tank in the Italian tree.
Because while built in Switzerland it’s not used by the Swiss.
yeah I know im making a joke lol
General Dynamics Land Systems- Canada
Do include the other 99% of the name.
2 Likes
I know it was a joke. But it has it’s place in a point about a certain other vehicle. One that rhymes with porty pun.
while looking into lav variants came across this accursed thing
You mean the subdivision of GD. Why would he include the full name?
the same reason you would for the Ajax as its being built by General Dynamics - UK
or the CV-90 as its BAE Systems AB
That was the Marines interest in the HSTV-L.
1 Like
You are aware he’s doing that to erase any Canadian involvement in the Canadian vehicle so he can claim it as pure American?
So I’m assuming your agree with his take then,
I don’t know why you would want to get i to specifics that like oh it “BAE America”. It’s BAE.
Assume what you want. I have always been to the point. None of this double talk like some people look to do.