Mate, I know about the trailer, they still don’t list WW1 in the game descriptions or the main selling points.
Smin has literally been saying that WW1 is a key feature of Aces of Thunder and it’s why we can’t keep the fighters from this event.
2 Likes
In ~6 months when this game fails, they will be rushing to add WWI planes to War Thunder. It will be the funniest thing in the world
5 Likes
The announcement Smin linked talks about WW1 being featured in addition to WW2. As far as Gaijins own advertisement for the game goes, WW2 will be the main focus and WW1 will be a secondary thing.
He never said that. He only ever said that AoT will feature WW1 aircraft and that the current April Fools event lets us obtain 7 WW1 vehicles, the Fokker and the SPAD being unobtainable without a specific reason being mentioned.
You’re spot on VR is definitely still a niche market, and that’s exactly why they should consider reinventing these aspects into War Thunder.
By pulling assets from Enlisted and Aces of Thunder, they could breathe new life into the game and take things to the next level with a more cutting-edge War Thunder 2.0. It feels like the perfect opportunity to really push boundaries, don’t you think?
Enlisted typically sees around 5,000 players online at any given time, while the newly announced Aces of Thunder, being VR-exclusive, will likely attract a similar number.
Compare that to War Thunder’s impressive 120,000 concurrent players it’s clear where the larger audience is.
From a business perspective, it would be a smart move to focus their efforts on War Thunder, as it’s one of their top revenue generators. And just to clarify, this isn’t about bias for the game (even though it’s fantastic), but purely about making sound business decisions.
It simply adds up.
2 Likes
Would rather have korea as a small unique tree than having all of their actually unique vehicles omitted just so they can come to Japan as a sub with as much copy paste as possible.
2 Likes
I’m hopeful for the game, but I know the player count after a few months will drop to the point where Gaijin starts questioning if they should keep it going or not.
I hope the game does well but I also think that stuff like WW1 aircraft shouldn’t be limited to sell a product which main selling point should be the fact that it’s a proper VR experience.
2 Likes
They won’t be rushing to add WW1 to WT. The money lies in modern era stuff, followed by Cold war era stuff and WW2 era stuff. The majority of WT players don’t care about WW1 and from what I’ve heard while playing the event, people are not enjoying the performance of WW1 vehicles at all.
1 Like
Just because you will, it doesn’t mean that enough others will
Unfortunately you are part of a minority
1 Like
Yeah they know that it’ll take people about 10 seconds after release to realize how unfun ww1 vehicles would be against interwar/ww2 vehicles.
Then again, people are still coping that ww1 vehicles would get preferential treatment in terms of BR for some reason.
1 Like
Mate, they keep games like CRSED, Star Conflict and Crossout running. AoT would have to fail entirely for them to drop it.
I believe the real potential lies in War Thunder’s solid and stable customer base. By ironing out the issues in the BR and ranking system, reworking the economy, and fully expanding on nations, they could create something truly incredible.
Add infantry to the mix, integrate the graphical enhancements from Enlisted (like detailed tank interiors), and leverage the VR advancements from Aces of Thunder, and you’d have a money-making powerhouse on your hands. The opportunity to revolutionize the game is right there.
and guess what there is noting out there to touch it!
They have the Monopoly
2 Likes
I would love to see WT player age distribution and how much impact a change from pegi 12 to pegi 16 would have.
Unfortunately I doubt we will ever see this data.
They will keep the games seperated to be able to maintain the lower age rating of WT, keep development simpler, keep the system requirements and the server loads for each game as low as possible and to be able to balance each game seperately.
The more features a single game gets, the more potential you have to break stuff while working on seemingly unrelated things.
They also already cannot be bothered to properly balance WT as it is. Do you really think they would start putting more effort into balance, if the game was way more complex?
They already have one. WT is raking in crazy money without having infantry, better VR or WW1 content.
2 Likes
Why stop, they could get more, the player base is the key and war thunder has that!
They won’t get more to the point that this kind of effort would be justified. Getting the Enlisted players that don’t already play WT and the potential AoT players over would be a drop in the ocean.
2 Likes
adding new nations is more likely to attract more playerbase
For example adding indian vehicles would attract indians, and as we all know there’s many of them
2 Likes
I totally support that, more nations the better for everybody
Thats why this is such a great idea and should be incorporated into war thunder like yesterday
2 Likes
Who’s to say that both isn’t a good idea.
I want to see more WW1-interwar stuff and more nations(or at least the Sub-tree rework that was linked)
Both would bring in plenty of money(form those who play for fun and don’t chase META). Yes nations are likely clearer sources but WW1 can be given to (almost)all nations already.
2 Likes
sure we can get both, but everything you add takes dev time, and there is stuff that is just better done by others games