Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

I say C&P for a battlepass is a good thing, as it leaves unique stuff for the TT.

But we also got to hope it isn’t a different operator nations(and likely taking away a major vehicle of its history) if in the US tree, or if it’s somewhere else it isn’t something that would be miles useful in the TT(as the nation doesn’t have a domestic equivalent(or it was key to their history so should be TT))

1 Like

J-11B has domestic missiles, any way, J-15 won’t be so nice. It will has similar FM to SU-33, meaning that it has bigger drag and looses energy quickly.
also, 48 CMs

That is possible. P-51D-20 with hispanos used by Israel, and for the tank reward, id like some kind of ZBL08(basic) or other light tanks for China.

if its going to be a sherman and a P51 im going to laugh

Much lighter than Su-33 and still possesses domestic chinese avionics equipment, it will complement J-11B but i hope china recieves an aircraft with an ESA radar as opposed to type 1493 (which can be added later on J-11B block 02)

1 Like

Is there a source on the CM count for J-15? It’s not just an SU-33 so we can’t assume the CM count is the same

Hopefully they add it with the WS-10B instead of the AL-31 though I have no confidence

1 Like

not that much I think, less difference than J-11B and SU-27. and it doesn’t have new engine like J-11B. SU-33’s bigger comes most from bigger wings, and rest from more aoa created by canards. So J-15’s FM will be very similar to SU-33.

counted from photos, the CM blocks stays same.

this should be good enough, since it’s one of the best none-esa Radar.

it must have better ammo than gepard

Will function like the chinese Gepard,
Invisible AHEAD rounds, high velocity, AESA radars, great optics, great mobility and overall a really promising looking SPAAG, can’t wait for it

1 Like

its just a game lol you took it too serious.

is it realestic that both mother air bases of two teams are 10km away from a battlefield? lol

also a BIG threat to enemy tanks lol

The point he is trying to make is that it would be to complicated for a player to control the different aspects of multi vehicle sam systems without unrealistic simplification on gaijin’s end

2 Likes

so it’s better to choose the ones that only need 2 vehicles. I think there are plenty

i think both teams in high battle rate should have two radar stations, the launcher is the player, the station is 2km away from battlefield for example. if enemy hit the radar station, it take one min for radar station to be accessable again for the s-300/patriot players

They better not give B-50 in the battlepass

Other than that, I am OK with a copy pasted P-51K and a weird experimental B-xx variant

there is many ways to add s-300 patriot and others to the game, just add them! lol

clearly not these two, their missile range is even too far for air RB, place some in the middle of map, no one can escape.
there are many close range things, focus on below 20km

1 Like

The next reward is most likely a random boat, free plane and a tank. If we do consider China, Japan and Israel got a recent event vehicle(+Britain), the major reward is likely to be Soviet or Italian considering they didnt get a major BP reward for some time.

1 Like

we need better SPAAs for all nations in high battle rate, right now my VT-1 wont work anymore lol

if you do some maneuvers with your jet at 5km away from me, my VT-1 wont hit you lol