Looks at Challenger 2 TES
Trust me, It doesnt help
This is a decent upgrade though.
I don’t know what IFVs could be addes that would havebgreat impact. Especially with them tightening maps to reduce almost remove flanking.
SPAA i won’t think will be coming this update whenI asked smin about it last R&R he said they just staryed looking at multi vehicle SPAA so it too soon.
As for how my comment saying the v3 is over sue I don’t see how it is wrong. The v3 should have came out long ago with the last leopard they added. Also if they start modeling the v3 there is a chance it will put more work and attention to all the previous abrams bugs reported.
Britian has been hoping this since the Challenger 2 was added. 5 Challenger 2s later and we are still waiting
ACV-30 might be a contender for Top Tier but more likely will fall before the HSTV-L.
1 Like
They will fix it when they add the chally 130
We are expecting it to be maybe fixed when we have the Challenger 4 or maybe the Challenger 5 added to the game
1 Like
Challenger 8’s will repel alien landing craft attempting to invade Birmingham, mark my words
If that’s the case then America mains have nothing to complain about and the SEP is the best tank in the game
I’d like what this guy’s on.
1 Like
Nah… Nothing of worth in Birmingham, not worth the resources. We’ll just le tthe alien invasion take what the want and only repel the invasion if they try to attack anywhere else :P
Please read the comment I replied to
He said the extra armor isn’t going to really help it cause of the other issues with the tank. Not that they would be useless.
Challengers got extra armor but all the other bugs wrong with it makes it somewhat moot.
They’ll attempt to use it as a base of operations since there’s nothing else they could use it for if they did successfully invade (trust me bro)
If the LFP was fixed the Abrams would become the best tank in the game. Morvran was implying that the LFP DU wouldn’t help when I strongly believe it would. If we use the turret cheek armor with DU as a placeholder the Abrams is really only pennable on the turret ring.
The Strv 122s and Leopard 2A7V would still be better, actually.
Buffing the lfp won’t stop IFV with 23mm running through the turret ring.
1 Like
How? The Abrams has a better reload and equivalent round. Same mobility.
How many of those are you running into at top tier? If fixed the turret ring at max could provide like 300mm of protection which wouldn’t even come close to stopping high caliber sabot rounds. And yes I think the turret ring should be fixed as well.
I can work with keeping my LFP hidden. Most of my pens have been in the turret ring and gun mantle.
1 Like
You wouldn’t need to if you used the SEPV3.
Every tank should have a weakspot. Leopards have the UFP/LFP and the drivers port. T series have the drivers port and LFP.
You are just assuming that Gaijin will model the SEPv3 correctly and it will actually be unpennable. No reason to assume they wont just model it as a SEPv2 with APS.
2 Likes