Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

nope there’s Rafale M for that

as @quartas121 said regarding US jets :

…and that’s just not something french gov likes very much, better build our own stuff

to get back on topic, i’m genuinely curious (and maybe a bit concerned) as to how gaijin plans to implement the longer range SAMs. will they be able to move and are they going to be restricted inside of the tank battlefield space ? It wouldn’t make any sense imo

2 Likes

why do peple still ask for it even though they already have the EF

2 Likes

Personally, I think it’s Rafale M first standard (late production)

“Ground Forecs” “Realstic” “Laoperd” “Blcak Night”

But how about a Rafale A then :)

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/nlLyanTsuYDj

in wart thunder for simulated players the dropping of “laser” GBUs is quite delicate, in cockpit view, we are missing the audible signal or HUD indication of dropping the “laser” GBUs. Currently in simulated cockpit view, for a hit on target you have to be about 5 to 3 kilometers away + a 45 degree nose down angle for the GBU laser to detect the laser while in realistic battle mod the CCIP helps us to make shots at more 10,000 meters easy

with smooth bombs we have the CCRP system which will drop the bomb at the right time even if we have the bomb release button held all the way, we could all simply have the same system with the GBUs as the designation pod places CCRP points to place the laser

example in video : https://youtu.be/RY_rVxgvpn4?t=296

maximum support will be a pleasure and do not hesitate to provide further information in this report

This plus working CCIP/RP markers would be great to see.

I think its going to be placed near the heli spawn or maybe it will have a dedicated spawn outside of the tank battlefield

Fake as heck.
The day 99A and WZ1001 get 6.8 second reload is the day I win a ten million dollar lottery.

2 Likes

They probably ask for it to annoy Smin. Hell I am sure he wakes up everyday hoping to see a comment about the EAP.

No, keep the J-7E where it is and make a separate plane with PL-8s

1 Like

Impossible.

It’s like they took one of my dream lists and implemented it, too good to be true xD.

That being said, unless Gaijin’s sources differ from the ones I’ve come across, OFL F2 and L28A1 would not really be much different from F1 and 27A1.

So J-7E from china tech tree remodel & renamed to J-7H instead ?

1 Like

No, keep the J-7E at 11.3. Add a new fighter which is named the J-7E (Late) at 12.0 with PL-8s.

Nah, the J-7E is perfect where it is, better option is to introduce the J-7H as a separate vehicle, but it will be outclassed with the great IR missiles but sub-par FM and no radar missiles. Best to leave it as it is.

Perhaps J-7H as an event vehicle.

1 Like

I can guarantee you, no Hungarian at all wanted Hungary to be in Italy.

I can also guarantee you, you’ve just made that up to try to make yourself look more better.

Top tip Sunday : If you’re still coping about Hungary then get over it

Personally, depends on gaijin

It might J-7L

I’m not making this up, I’m talking about my experience and interactions of the Hungarian community from before the addition and after the addition.

And how many months ago was this ?

March - September '23

Where are we now, we’re in the month of December of '24 just two days to go till 25.
Italy would be worse off without Hungary and Hungary would off never be added to the game.
It was always Gaijin plan to add Minor Axis nations to Italy as far back as 2018.