Or at this point just add faction tags to vehicles.
So like,
Countries, Operators then tags.
Match
Match Country : France, Britain and Italy, Germany vs Germany, Sweden and Russia.
Faction setting : France, Britain and Italy, West Germany vs East Germany, Hungary and Russia.
Depending on the tag that the time has been set Hungarian vehicles won’t be paired up with Italian vehicle depending who side you wanna pick or prioritize, you will be auto swapped to the correct side.
So you’re Italian vehicles would be locked at it doesn’t meet the faction requirements because you tagged the Hungarian side.
But even this isn’t a prefect system since you gonna take into account allied nations with Warsaw pact tanks.
Ok I just seen this video by TEC Link and yeah he makes some valid points here.
Removing these packs from Israel is just odd since they almost got nothing there.
With them confirming more sub trees are in the works, China and guess who next yes Israel are the ones who has room for them.
So either they are adding a sub to Israel next year or rank 1 to 3, I mean the S-199 can easily be rank 2 and the first spitfire can be rank 3
Its not me that seems to not be able to handle it unfortunately. Some people cant seem to let it go. EAP wont be coming to the game. There is no need to introduce what would need to be an almost entirely fabricated aircraft (in order to have basic required functionality in game) for it at any BR anymore that cant be filled by real aircraft other rather than an unarmed, combat radar-less, countermeasure lacking non combat technology demonstration aircraft, who’s sole purpose was as a flying testbed to gather data and prove the systems / foundations for the European Future Fighter program.
The comparison to the Mirage 4000 simply doesn’t line up. The Mirage 4000 had all of the systems it has in game or there were detailed plans had the prototype progressed. The Mirage 4000 compares better to the Yak-141 in that regard. Not the EAP. Yak-141 was a fully functional prototype of a combat aircraft, with all the detailed plans, tests and requirements for weaponry.
EAP wasn’t even a prototype of a combat aircraft and was not intended to be. All it was ever primarily intended to do was prove the design, construction and aerodynamic systems of a next generation fighter could be achieved as a proof of concept.
Even the F-16AJ, which as we explained at the time was an exception rather than a rule, was a last resort means to balance the gameplay for Japan, providing them with something filling a huge capability cap that would have existed for some time does not mean the EAP is possible. Vehicles like the AJ are chosen when the remaining options are limited in terms of realistic and fully functional vehicles. And in the case of Britain and her subtrees, there are no such lack of options in the future that would require an entirely ahistorical EAP to be added.
OFLF2 and L28A1 are worse than what the game already contains, the F2 aims to improve reliability while the L28 is an export round.
Besides the spelling mistake its also very not true considering that the T-90M which is worse than the BVM gets a bump.
…and that’s just not something french gov likes very much, better build our own stuff
to get back on topic, i’m genuinely curious (and maybe a bit concerned) as to how gaijin plans to implement the longer range SAMs. will they be able to move and are they going to be restricted inside of the tank battlefield space ? It wouldn’t make any sense imo
in wart thunder for simulated players the dropping of “laser” GBUs is quite delicate, in cockpit view, we are missing the audible signal or HUD indication of dropping the “laser” GBUs. Currently in simulated cockpit view, for a hit on target you have to be about 5 to 3 kilometers away + a 45 degree nose down angle for the GBU laser to detect the laser while in realistic battle mod the CCIP helps us to make shots at more 10,000 meters easy
with smooth bombs we have the CCRP system which will drop the bomb at the right time even if we have the bomb release button held all the way, we could all simply have the same system with the GBUs as the designation pod places CCRP points to place the laser
