The addition of the F-117 certainly renewed my hopes of seeing more strategic and tactical bombers being added. I desperately need to have V-Bombers, the BAC TSR-2, YB-35/YB-49, A3D-1, B-45, Sukhoi T-4, Tu-22M and Mirage IV in War Thunder!
2 Likes
If you play it then gaijin can see its performing badly, its unfortunate it resorts to that but it is what it is, there are a lot of vehicles to balance after all
Where did that Chinese saluting profile picture go? I’ve been trying to find it and I swear it’s disappeared.
Edit: Nevermind I might actually be blind
Don’t forget the B-47, 52, 1B, 36 and the FB-111
It was based on the AIM-4D, so not an upgrade, but still related.
If you got anything on it then i’d be glad to put in on the big falcon thread
I also hope “clear” weather comes back in 2025. So tired of “cloudy”, “thunderstorms”, and “hazy”.
3 Likes
I hope we get actual night battles for ARB and some more interesting weather effects. Thunderstorms without lightning, thunder or even rain are pretty lame tbh
(idk how to quote properly so i’ll make due)
So by this logic, Britain having 4 SPAA from 10.0 to 10.3 alone isn’t “heavily stacked”?
It’s like giving Russia another SPAA compared to other nations needing it “just because”.
And I feel more people have asked for the RAF Sabre than people have asked for another C&P “Indian” AA at the already stuffed BR.
If it’s the whole “Dont want X nation to be left out”, then why leave out Britain for a Sabre?
Not everyone wants to play Top Tier, sometimes paying attention to the minority (I havent looked at stats) can be beneficial.
The amount of people that ask for WW2 stuff and Korean War stuff is higher than you’d think. Heck, I know some people that only play those BRs.
3 Likes
that + terrain following radar would be cool unlike rocky pillars
You know what would be even better than terrain following radar?
No longer having to deal with 50 meter tall trees…
1 Like
Trees arent the issue imo, ECM should be added as well as terrain following radar so you dont need to be risking a tree strike to survive a radar missile in a plane that lacks an rwr or chaff
Made one myself, additions are not uniformly rated. based on of much I like them as additions, how I find they play and fight against them.
1 Like
Will there be plan to add ‘subtree’ to naval? For instance, GRB and JPN coastal tree would be much better with addition of India and Thailand.
2 Likes
Sure, trees aren’t the main issue when it comes to avoiding SARH/ARH missiles, but I would still like to be able to fly as low as possible without having to deal with unrealistically huge trees.
To me this isn’t just about multipathing, as you can also use natural cover to dodge IR missiles and to get enemy planes off your tail, but huge trees tend to make following the natural cover more of a gamble than a test of maneuvering skill.
High speed Tornado F.3 in a forested hilly area is death at low alt lol
I get what you mean
1 Like
I play them sometimes, trouble is they are so awful i get mad at them after one match, usually from a sabre dunking on me
im one of them
thank you for making these points
1 Like
ground has been in the game for over a decade.
thats fair but there not much more you can do
1 Like