Absolutely stupid decision making…and like we arnt talking about U.S or Russia no its literally choosing between China (who has many vehicles and lots of domestic options that haven’t been added plus +Taiwan) vs Japan who has always just been alone and only recently got a Thai F-5 for some relief…they are choosing a nation that has plenty of options vs a nation that has been here since the start and has always needed more options.
7 Likes
That much is true, Smin’s original post said that the plan was subject to change.
Still it would be wild if every single top ship was pushed out of the update.
my bad that they can’t find anyone to outsource the moddeling of british BB’s
1 Like
Too bad they cant find anyone to outsource them a 5th graders understanding of geopolitics.
Leaks nowadays
Hello everyone.
As a rule, we do not comment on rumors and speculations of the community regarding War Thunder, because most of you are much more interested in learning about new features and changes from trailers and patch notes. But this time we could not ignore the statement made above about increasing the cost of ammunition and reducing silver earnings by 50%. We did not have such plans in the past and do not have them now. Moreover, as part of the roadmap, we did just the opposite - increased silver lion earnings, and also reduced ammunition costs, and therefore do not plan to revert these changes.
86 Likes
Hmmmm
2 Likes
9 Likes
Are you planning a reduction though?
7 Likes
9 Likes
The F?
ASEAN to China … why? … coz of increased Chinese players?
People were against RoC M1A2T and Pak T-80UD in Chinese TT … but now will instead get Leopard 2s?? … and China already got a Leopard 2 knock-off i.e WZ-1224:
along with loads of other prototypes, export stuffs and RoC future stuffs.
Thailand and Malaysia, I can understand, coz demographic and relation.
But others should be added to bolster Japanese TT i.e Indonesia, Singapore (can be Israel as well), Korea etc …
Japan makes perfect sense for other Asian stuffs … ffs
10 Likes
Smin does like his precise words, so good question xD
4 Likes
so what about the asean tree for china part?
thats propably the more debatable thing for a lot as well
12 Likes
Will trust you as after what happend last time Gaijin would make a big mistake if the “leak” was true.
But i would like to ask question. Would it be possible to see increase of adding vehicles from sub-tt nations. Personally at this point it feels like if we are lucky, we get like 1 vehicle from sub-tt nation per year. Thank youbif you answer this question
Thank you for the quick addressing and transparency! It’s good news to read that, and I hope the rumour can be put to rest now.
I, for one, rest assured after reading your message. o7
5 Likes
Is there a statement on the Chinese subtree plans as well?
I fully understand the need for Chinese subtrees, but taking some of the very limited subtree options Japan has is simply not acceptable.
The whole of ASEAN, especially the NATO aligned nations like Singapore and Indonesia, entering China also seems mildly politically charged, something Gaijin strives to avoid.
Instead China can have plenty of subnations like Pakistan, Bangladesh, North Korea (if Korea is split) and even some ASEAN nations that fit the tree well like Myanmar and Laos.
This way Japan can get comparable subtrees in the form of the more NATO aligned ASEAN nations like Indonesia, Singapore and Thailand.
15 Likes
just how it goes for the uk, it would seem that the fox was to good of a vic and will now stop us from receiving any new tanks or planes until 2025
1 Like
not to mention that china pretty much already exists out of 2 nation as well which provide modern stuff from all sides
1 Like