Yet they have the USSR flag plastered on them.
Because of that is isn’t truly a DPRK vehicle.
1 Like
We still have the many many 4th gen’s left to be added, and the late 4th gen modifications
F-15EX, MiG 35D, Eurofighter Typhoon Tranche 3A
Ect, ect
2025 is likely the earliest we would see a 5th gen fighter
And it will be mind numbing to play
F-35’s, F-22’s, SU-57’s and J-20’s only at the top
Everyone who doesn’t have one, will just have to suck it up
I hope they just wait till 2026-2027 for 5th gen’s
No rush to add them, maybe spend a year on WW1 stuff, and work on filling holes and decompression
PROPER decompression
Im not against it, tbh at this point a good option would be to add operator nation line ups. I.e. if you have the Canadian leopard in the German tree, you can make a line up with the candats. Would solve most on the inevitable complaints about a brenulux tree (did I do that acronym right?)
1 Like
There isn’t an R in Belgium, but I appreciate the effort xd
In my defence im an idiot dyslexic
1 Like
This seems like a neat idea but I can’t see Gaijin doing it. Generally if a similar vehicle can exist in a separate tech tree, Gaijin prefers to have it duplicated and you’ve got to grind that separate nation to get it. Plus, how would that even work in the UI?
The nations in War Thunder are treated like “decks” that you draft “cards” (vehicles) out of to make a “hand” (lineup). Allowing players to mix and match pieces from other decks would run contrary to Gaijin’s balancing and economic policies.
But it does sound cool
Am I the only person who liked the Silent Thunder event from years back?
I’d like to see ww1 → Semi-modern attack subs make their way to the game eventually
Also expansion of early cold-war era aircraft (1945-1960)
WW1 additions might be interesting, but it could be hard to implement them so they aren’t ass to play.
Hopefully some top-tier weapon-type additions. I’d like to see CBUs, AntiRAD, ASHMs, etc implemented in a way that’s still fun and hopefully not totally lopsided.
And maybe a PVE Co-op game mode with a top-tier focus like heli PVE but less ass and more varied.
4 Likes
We already have such a mode, though it is exclusively in arcade mode.
Its also not good. Literally just shoot the wall of bombers and shoot the grid of totally defenseless artillery.
I want AI that can fight back, hopefully make use of the bots that can shoot missiles and all those SAM systems they’ve got modeled but not implemented.
And it should be hard enough that the rewards gained are competitive with playing air RB for 6 minutes rather than +500rp after playing for 30 minutes.
I would really oppose any form of BENELUX before other themes are explored first. Pan-Arab, Yugoslavia or LATAM should come first, but BENELUX isn not too bad as well.
I see
I imagine you’d only be able to so it in select operator countries, but yeah a pipe dream
Yugoslavia isn’t comparable to LATAM or Arab league, because it was an actual country in modern history.
I find the Arab concept to be terrible though and wouldn’t like to see it.
Similar case to LATAM, but those people are so starved for content that I’d allow it. I’d much rather ABC tree, but it is what it is.
2 Likes
Personally, I think the Middle Eastern nations can make up a few different tech trees with Iran being the Major one.
Iran isn’t Arab, but it would be a good independent Israeli styled tree
1 Like
I worded that wrong, I meant Middle Eastern lol
I’ve seen ideas like this before scrap the TTs but people point out it just ends with people making a line-ups of the best vehicles in the game and rarely play anything else.
Similar to why I’m against multi-nation trees with a large number of nations like a “Commonwealth tree”
Plus the added lesser-seen nation in military games would make Gaijin tons of money when marketing it to those nations. Things like the lesser-seen Eastern European nations (Poland, Chezsovakia, Yougoslave, Romnia) or the remaining British dominions (Canada, Australia, New Zealand) basically nations that have an online presence.
This can easily be seen with sub-tree popularity with Finland and Hungary being more popular than South Africa.
UK’s sub-tree might have been more popular is it was the ANZACs of Canada but now all we have for them is to push for a tree for both or one of them and the other being a sub-tree of that one.
2 Likes
But what would Iran add to the table to justify a tree for them and an Arab tree?
Wouldn’t 95% be copy paste? Maybe with things like “this one has its side skirts removed” “this one has an extra m60 mounted on the top” “this one has 5 more ERA panels over the Russian version”
It’s not that compelling, at least with my knowledge of what is used by Iran
I mean the Karrar looks nice, but it alone wouldn’t justify a whole new tree
It would have quite a lot of aviation and ground modifications, you’d be surprised.