We could get both MK.1 and Mk.2 under the prototype rules.
As the Iroquois engine needed for it was built. Tho my worry is both would end up as event vehicles under this new system or the first air reward for a “Dreams comes true” event.
At least with a Canadian tech-tree, they should have to have at least one as a tech-tree vehicle.
It’s part of a family of vehicle with different weaponry and i found them damn cool visually !
Résumé
Here the LOHR VPX 5000: small as wiesel, 4 ready to lauch HOTs missile, and 35 hp/t (30 for wiesel). One of the numberous things that would be cool to have.
Not a thing. Some posts by Shini making things personal, and a wind down from that pretty much.
Minor disagreements about the legitimacy of the leaks as well.
After all, it’s everyone right to believe them or not.
Oh, ok so nothing worth thinking about. I really don’t get why some people are so in denial of any and all leak. Yeah sure, we often start off with a bunch of fakes, but once a good source puts in a good list, and it’s starts getting proved right, that’s when I don’t understand why some people act so in denial about the list.
I’ve had the leak list saved for a bit, and I know it came out before the first devblogs, plus there’s no way you just randomly guess shit like the British helicopter or French SPAA, so we already have good reason to trust it. Idk whats up with people, maybe it’s mods on alts trying to speed doubt lol
it isnt even about this list, he didnt accept even the list for the last 2 updates, because the in his words the guy propably just edited them afterwards to be right, when everyone told him they didnt change
The guy believes +10 people are trying to psyop him and feeding him lies, i never saw the forum so united yet to just get sth in a dull persons head
When i have 3 people misinforming me, i will definetly trust the same people who are making claims to me.
For example, i had 3 people tell me that the website they linked contains a feature where editing will show up (similar to this forum), however, one of them then posted a screenshot of wikipedia that says complete opposite, that you cant even edit posts, however this claim lacked any citing as the screenshot showed. Then the 2 others said that the feature they claimed to exist can’t be shown by them because they don’t know chinese and they don’t know how the website works, so when someone makes false claims for the sake of their argument, my default will be not believing them.
Additionally, i was ready to take up on someones offer of seeing the discord itself as proof and they claimed that i would not believe it, however as i agreed to prove them wrong, however the person who made that claim refused despite making the initial claim, again.
So, through these facts that are verifiable, and receiving a bunch of harassment as “counter arguments” (you can scroll up to see), you probably understand where my skepticism comes from wether someone is right or not.
When i question something as per the topic, i’m met with made up information and harassment.
Also, there were a bunch of conspiracies like them saying that i am a “undercover developer”, and “alt account of alviswisla”. Even the chinese guy initially in agreement with them called these guys drunk, lol.