Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

reminds me about the British Nuke project

image
i wonder why it went sour

ah look still trying to flex after they got slapped by 9Li

1 Like

They got new stat

Sell planes and then not allow you to use the beeter stuff only theirs

1 Like

image
they US these this like the bad hot thing, oh you already know can i help?

NO!!

ok guess ill figure it out.

Hey US check this thing out.

(well shit this is pretty good. but we already producing the other one.)

well i gotta make some money back somehow

wait a minute thats my job back off

etc etc

and idk why yall are moaning about the swedish 9M that isnt actually a 9M

as far as WT they basically are indentical so they get the copy paste treatment

For the Gripen, you are right it doesnt overly matter. Same for the F4F-ICE if it gets Aim-9M instead of Aim-9Li.

though historical accuracy is kinda the point of War Thunder. So getting it right would be nice.

But from a balance point of view. It raises other questions. For example. If Sweden cant get Aim-9M despite never buying or equipping Aim-9M onto their airframes. Though intergration was possible due to other nations doing so (Hungary iirc). Then could germany and italy get PGMs on their Tornado IDS? Could Britain get ATAS for our Apaches. Etc etc.

Its a question well worth answering and having a solid answer for.

1 Like

iirc gaijin never said that the RB74(M) was a 9M tho just an equivilant

Well they only JUST added AIM-9P-4s so I doubt we’ll get L-i’s anytime soon

1 Like

Yep, Though if it has a smokeless motor, then its a Aim-9M not an Aim-9Li

They havent even added Python-4s yet for Israel right?

1 Like

iirc Li-1 was smokeless cant remember the further improvement

I dont think it was. Just AIm-9L with a different seeker. but could be wrong

Nope only the poor 3s even though theyre really good theyre very flare hungry in most aspects, I mean we’ve got the AAM-3 I dont see why we cant get the Python 4

lol even the wiki says its a AIM-9Li-1 so it def could be

Well it could be esentially the same missle I mean we only do have the VERY initial AIM-9M

They have said that it’s an AIM-9M multiple times.

Honestly I dont see the point of IRCCM. Recent experience with Aim-9M and Magic IIs. They feel like they ahve the same flare resistance as an SRAAM. They go for flares 100% of the time, in any aspect. even rear and target on AB

1 Like

its an equivilant to a 9M in WT standards so it basically is one

Its so dependent on the player fired at honestly I fire a lot of 9Ms that get flared but I fire A LOT of Magics that dont get flared IRCCM is so luck based its funny