They got it and used it with the Gripen as it couldn’t of been used for anything else
If you think other wise boo hoo
Do you have a source?
That they bought them yes
But not that they used them, is that correct?
And that matter how cause it is pretty obvious what they did with them
Again, buying something doesn’t mean that it was used or even delivered.
It was delivered
And when you buy something and then a few years later get a plane that can use it you will its not a massive leap in logic or anything here
You are missing the point.
1 Like
Your point is irrelevant
My point is that buying doesn’t mean using, or, in other words, that it very much is not irrelevant.
1 Like
Do you have evidence that they didn’t use them?
That doesn’t prove that it was used.
1 Like
Yeah if they then used a plane that never used RB74 that point would be valid but it isn’t
Yeah they just kept them and didn’t use on the Gripen
Imagine arguing over what sweden used when they have a T-80 and an Mi-28
We’re not talking about the game.
No it proves that no matter if it was 9L or 9M to the Swedish it was all RB 74
Even worse you’re off topic completely
Already mentioned ubove that the t80 makes no sense and the helicopter is there because there is literally nothing. Due tell of a replacement if you find one though
1 Like