Those all had filenames right?
i dont thinkso
I mean yeah that’s probably what is being done.
Harrier pilots had all the advantages and most Mirage airframes were as far as I know not shot down by Harriers either.
British pilots even flew backseat in Belgian Mirage 5 to train fight it.
Combined with more modern technology on the Harrier and “behind it” to support it, it is nothing to be proud off that some Mirages, with severely reduced staying ability due to problems with range were shot down by Harriers.
Be happy that the Argentinian navy was not able to operate it’s 209 class submarines properly.
Just wondering where F-18 and SU-33 are…
AIM-7 and R-27 are their bread and butter.
Having them added after AIM-120 and R-77 would be strange.
If only the harrier was super sonic… a man can dream…
Seeing as the basic F-15 and Su-27 were just added, nope
Slap enough rocket boosters on it…and you’ll find a way to go supersonic. No flutter in space…or sound…or other earthly problems.
When did that ever make a difference? For gameplay I barely see a difference.
F18a could have been added 6 months ago after f16c dropped. F16c still missing the vast majority of its armament and having the wrong pod is still an issue tho.
That and we almost made a super sonic harrier type called the p.1154 had part of its airframe and engines made
Was it supersonic?
Didnt leave the mount but most likely if the airframe held up…
Oh. Somehow I didn’t notice the mount
Harriers were already very close to mach anyhow
There are still multiple issues with these aircraft alone, and I really doubt much more advanced and intricate airframes would be added mere months afterwards.
yeah but it’s significantly larger
What would these issues be? Neither is much more advanced than what we have in game.
I would like to know what you are aiming at exactly with that intricacy argument.
Su-33 is nothing but a navalised SU-27 with teh same 80s technology.
F-18A/B aka the normal Hornet would to the best of my knowledge bring nothing new to the table.