she didnt say it was fake… she just said it wasnt her and cant confirm credibility
stop misinforming people
Dude give him a break it wasn’t his fault that he got the info wrong even I have brain fart moments.
1 Like
russia has 2 3 fox 3 carriers, the yak 141 smt and the su39
so yea russia is not getting anything, unless they add a better su25 in tt? 😏
besides if 27 was to get r77s, it would have 6(or 8 i dont remember) which is way more potent than 6 r27ers when you can f&f
if someone pretended to be her then its fake
you don’t try to fake your real leak
1 Like
or you know… its a disguise
its not as why
it came from the same person who shared the event leak
it is not far fetched
Given this guy got around 75% of stuff right over two to 3 list.
And a separate source with the same leak with more clarification.
Then I say this leak looks pretty solid
Ovlia told us to take it as false, in the case of a leak false and fake are the same thing.
she is not outright denying it, just suggesting
2 Likes
to be clear this is someone trying to impersonate me. = Someone is using her name
technically I can’t say for sure that the info is incorrect because I have no information on future patches beyond what I have posted about previously, = She doesn’t know if the info is fake or not
but the fact they are trying to pretend to be me suggests it is false. = It could be or it not be
2 Likes
Just cause leak lists overlap doesn’t mean they are reliable
1 Like
Well for now I’ll take it as a fake after all you can only have right(correct) or wrong(fake) with a leak.
And being told to take it as false is perfectly being told to take it as fake.
Besides impersonating someone else just pushes it more to the fake to me as they only be doing the to make it seem real.
1 Like
I mean that is why we are here isn it ?
To discus whether or not we believe in these lists.
I am indeed discussing.
wdym overlap
as far as im aware olivia hasnt leaked the f20 f2 and the other ones
2 Likes
There been another guy in a private discord that had leaked the same stuff but also said the F-2 and one of the O4 was a mistake.
But also correcting that Japan will get a top tier jet.
6 Likes
Just a general statement about faulty logic
I think I’m misremembering lol. I think you’re right here.
So in sum, what’s in the files for an R-77 carrier presently is Yak-141, and what’s in the game for the USSR tree that could carry it as is (or with a modification) is the Su-39, MiG-29SMT, and Yak-141.
After looking through the sources, the SU-27SM is basically an Su-27 upgraded with Su-30MK2 technology. Given that the Su-30MK2 came from the Su-30MKK, and the Su-30MKK is the Chinese designation and variant for the Su-30MK, the export model of the Su-30M, which is the (first) multirole upgrade designed shortly after the creation of the Su-30… I still think the most appropriate multirole Sukhoi with Fox-3 capabilities will be the Su-30M. As far as I’m concerned, that really should be the next Flanker, outside of a new Flanker matching a large leap in tech, like we’d see in a December patch.
Why hasn’t M735 been fixed? It’s been almost 6 months and it was a bogus report that was supposed to be fixed.