Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

So what you saying is typhoon asap then?

3 Likes

No, I’m saying leave a gap, like there is in the US SPAA line.

If your country can’t fulfill its needs, then it has to deal with it.

Morvan don’t continue it, we’re talking to a wall

Yeah, no thanks. I know the US mains need nothing but downtiers to do well, but other nations should be playable at every BR as well

6 Likes

Yeah, the US mains really need to learn to share. Maybe Gaijin should leave them with the F15A for the next year

5 Likes

yeah, and who is that guy anyway

Ok. So if parts are what is needed to bring it to the US. You are in favour of US aircraft using British engines going to the UK correct?

After all the only relation to the US the Skink has is the Original blueprints that helped build the tank it’s built on.

Grizzly -Canadian
Polsten- Polish/British
Nations the uses/tested- Canada and the UK

The simple fact it the US didn’t even look at the project to give it the light of day well the UK got involved to order the project.

4 Likes

So you agree that Gaijin should add foreign built SPAA to fill the gaps in the US tree?

You realize the US was vastly more involved with the Skink than the British were with the F18 and F16? British mains expect F16s because New Zealand almost bought them. Demanding F16s and F18s that you never used or owned or tested because it fills a gap in your tree, while denying US mains an SPAA developed from a tank based on US designs, using US built components.

What vehicle in the US tree is similar to the British wanting F16s?

a random US Main it seems, never seen him here

3 Likes

The US contributed nothing to the Skink, Idk why people cant understand that concept. I think the US mains don’t want other nations to get their equipment because other nations will get a better variant.
Britain is fully capable of getting the Canadian CF-18, but they’re gonna cry.

4 Likes

Man, these dovblegs are taking too long. At least we know that the update will be ground focused :^].

1 Like

The Skink was a program specifically between Canada and Britain, US wasn’t part of that program, and it was built on a Canadian licensed hull, so US mains need to stop crying over this stuff.

3 Likes

what about this thing

instead of malding over the Skink and crying over any possible addition involving US related vehicles why not support some SPAAs that could actually fill gaps in the US tree?

stop wasting time, start helping to close this gap

4 Likes

Wrong it will be premium focused ;)

Here we are the parts argument again. AKA one of the worst arguments.

The US had no involvement in the Skink program. Your argument is that the blueprint that Canada derived the Grizzly from is American and both nations’ shared parts using that claim I could make so many things not American.
Your argument is the same as saying: "The Sherman Firefly is a C&P trank

I’ll say it again it’s built on a Canadian tank, uses British guns and was used by both Canada and the UK

1 Like

F-18 isn’t even a better aircraft, it’s essentially an export Interceptor made from A Capable Multirole that would 200% go to the US anyways

2 Likes

What about it? I voted for it. I support it. Gaijin hasn’t added it. They added the Skink.

Quit crying about the F16 or F18. You’ll just have to take something horribly obsolete into upper tiers, like we do with the M42.

I was more or so referencing another nation got a better F-16 I think? I remember a nation get a better F-16 or F-15 and US mains were crying. I’m bad with wording sometimes

not really no, the US mains claimed it wa better but it was actually identical

was the Italian ADF or the israeli one I believe

1 Like