a boat that floats?
1 Like
Yes sound like hydroplane
They aren’t anymore, but keep in mind that these tanks were 6.7 at some point for quite a while. They were beyond stupid at that BR.
I have nothing against Britain getting decent-good vehicles.
My problem is with Morvran telling other nation mains “you already have X so you can’t get Y”, while about a year ago he was whining in a similar way as the people he bashes now. So every once in a while I like to show that there are people who see past his image and know the truth.
Prime examples are the F-15EX and M1A2 SEPv3 discussions over the last couple months.
I reckon most boats float
In this case, I prefer the intergalactic Yamato
1 Like
Except ones from a certain eastern nation
1 Like
i didnt play them at that time so i wouldnt know
but you have a problem with someone asking for the AESA typhoon when the plane it wass added with got an AESA and better missiles? and more of them at the time might i add
neither of them need to be added yet
2 Likes
the titanic didnt
Not really Titanic’s fault, just at the wrong place at the wrong time
2 Likes
I wonder if they’d add it with or without ATGM. Indonesia didn’t use them with it but the capability was still there and they had the missiles too.
Indonesian Marder 1A3 without ATGM
Indonesian MILAN ATGM
1 Like
this is true
Yeah imagine if Lusitania hit the burg instead of Titanic, it could of been way worse and more loss of life
and yet hes still da goat
My issue with the M1A2 SEPv3 is that its ALWAYS in the context of it being added alone, with A4 shells and every single buff imaginable and as if it would be 12.7 alongside everything else because “MERICA!”
-
it should NOT be added in a vacuum, especially as the Abrams is already one of the better MBTs at top tier, even though most american mains claim its the weakest top tier vehicle.
-
That A4 shells are not guranteed and if they do come, then equivalents for all nations should be added. Such as adding DM83.
F-15EX, I stand by my opinion that the F-15C GE is under BRed and should be 14.7 and I stand by my opinion that if the F-15EX is added, with every single upgrade it could get and slinging 16x Aim-120Ds, that any and all current arguements as to why the Typhoon MUST be artificially nerfed (and it is, you can claim otherwise because you personally despise the Typhoon, but it is artificially nerfed in pretty much every single respect) needs to get buffs. Alongside fixing some of its core issues, such as the broken as hell cockpit, buggy instructor, underperforming FM and BOL. It could get Aim-120Ds, it would still have half as many as the F-15EX, putting it at a notable advantage in the current meta.
im personally especially fed up with the notion that the Typhoon is some how banned from bug fixes because of its percieved OP-ness. and yet every other vehicle, no matter how good, are allowed bug fixes.
But both points will go completely over your head because you will see it as “Morvran whinning about just wanting an OP MBT and buffs for an aircraft that should never have been added raaaah” and thus dismiss both points entirely.
It should come without the missile launcher.
Its BR would be around 7.3
Spoiler
same case of the Chilean marder
in current top tier ground the SEPV3 isnt needed with the SEPV2 already being the 2nd best top tier mbt and yes i will die on the hill that its better than the 122s but if it came to the game with the T90M2 the Challenger 3 (the real one) the Leopard 2A7A1 the STRV123A or whatever sweden can get and obviously others its fine but they need to fix current nato mbt before we get the SEPV3 and its counterparts
I don’t think they’ll add it initially with 16 missiles though. It seems much more likely to pull a F-15C GE and release it with 12 and reserve the 4 extra missiles for if it underperforms.
Even if the F-15EX comes with 12x missiles I would advocate for the EFT to also get AIM-120Ds.
That way the F-15EX, AESA EFTs, Su-30SM2 and Rafale (maybe finally with that MICA range fix that French mains like to whine about) can move to 15.0. Leaving 14.7 for the F-15C GE, Su-30SM/MKM and J-15T.
I agree that any SEPv3 would be fine with just getting M829A2. However with Gaijin’s dripfeeding tactic of top tier MBTs there is a very good chance that it will show up alone.
Its certainly within the top 3 families, that is about as far as I am willing to put into writing, but the amount of people that claim its the weakest MBT and should have a BR reduction is just hilarious
Sweden is gine as they are. Their Strv 122s are sidegrades to the 2A7s and they have 3 of them in a single lineip.
I cant think of any reason why they wouldnt.
So what the hell is even the issue, this is EXACTLY what I was arguing to happen.
IF F-15EX is added, then Typhoon should get buffs like Aim-120D and yet here you are claiming that i just want OP buffs?
and that is my issue, especially given the fact that the US is not in that desperate need of a new MBT and yes, I do think Britain is one of the nations that need a new MBT in the form of a Challenger 3P4. (with the best shell currently in-game at the time of its addition for the record). Still would probably be a glass canon, but a glass canon that would hopefully be worthy of being 12.7.
1 Like