Lowkey it’s sounding to me like the Japanese community should have advocated for AAM-4B right away when it first got added rather than waiting until it’s already settled into its battle-rating.
Chinese community advocated for PL-12A for J-10C immediately within its introduction into the game so there was time to consider adding it and bumping its battle-rating.
Never too late to make a suggestion report for AAM-4B on F-2A like how a simple one was done for PL-12A on J-10C
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/B3zRm3BaZKXS
Whens the 2nd round of infantry CBT
Smin’s stated in the community update theres no updates on that yet.
@Smin1080p_WT will the new US jet also get the option to carry GBU 53 Storm Breakers, cause the US lack in good IR CAS capability ?
I asked him this a while ago, he said i should make a suggestion abt it. I tried to but the suggestion moderators take like 7 years to accept suggestions lol
Maybe no atgm but they do have the ccv with a high pen very fast firing auto cannon
Depends on how good they make the 120D over the existing missiles. Ideally they could add Indonesian Su-35 with R-27EA, or perhaps KF-21 with Meteor’s, but again that depends on implementation of how far they want to push advances of Rank 9 currently. 120D seems to be the bar at the moment, we have no way of knowing what else is coming for now. As far as fillers go, MiG-35 is just a MiG-29 with R-77-1’s with a max of 8 missiles, wouldn’t add much while still adding something for Russia top tier.
Outside of that, I see only copy paste fillers.
Where muh gamba boxes?
The Chinese New Year decoration is already up, so where are the boxes, huh?
I NEED GAMBA
Is R-27EA real yet?
Last time I checked it still didn’t exist
Sorry, where am I looking?
oh edit, I see, Su-34 has no radar drop off
Instead it has extended range beyond its limits :D
No surprise though, soviet tech is obviously superior
Technically speaking R27A was tested on MIG-29 so Gaijin could just slap 27A seeker on ER body easily.
I guess around battle rating 15.0 or 15.3 (air battle), but should be higher 14.7
Apologies if it isn’t totally accurate as i was using it as an example, no idea if it does in fact exist, in which case it’d just get practically an identical loadout as the Su-30SM2.
So the Dutch F-16 has been data mined. Do to me being on mobile, I’ve just copied the post.
2.53.0.90 → 2.53.0.91
- new vehicle: F-16A-5 [FRA]:
- tier VIII
- BR:
- AB: 12.3
- Air RB: 12.3
- Ground RB: 12.0
- Naval RB: 12.3
- Air SB: 12.7
- Ground SB: 12.0
- hidden unless the player owns it (all platforms)
- non-premium event vehicle
- identical to the F-16A-10, except:
- no GBU-8
- AIM-9P instead of AIM-9J
- https://i.imgur.com/pL9PS6R.png
- https://i.imgur.com/5fFwuQs.png
- https://i.imgur.com/rmjtVMc.png
- https://i.imgur.com/ymcwFWF.png
Swedish Air Force Gripen E receive AIM-120C-8 ?
I hope F-15E Radar Modernization Program (RMP) before F-15EX
