https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1r6ilvc/253090_253092/
2 Likes
Japan could get the BTR-4M, Pandur II, CCV, more modern Type-89 and some Malaysian stuff.
3 Likes
No, I wasnt. Do a quick Google search and you’ll see it. Or rather, shouldn’t cuz they’ve already swept it under the rug.
F-15JSI would be more modern right? Or am i wrong?
Players simply expect the game to be modeled correctly and realistically. Missiles like the PARS 3, Spike, and AGM-179 don’t have their top-attack profiles correctly modeled, and their performance is well below their real-world counterparts. If they only model certain weapons correctly (like the LMUR), where is the logic?
This isn’t just about one missile; the Brimstone, for example, still lacks its Fire-and-Forget (FnF) capability under the excuse of ‘balancing.’ Looking at the current state of other missiles, that excuse doesn’t hold up anymore. We also see things that feel more like magic than reality, such as the current state of LDIRCM or the Terminator’s (BMPT) armor.
Not to mention the state of the maps, where Gaijin thinks it’s okay to place a 50-meter tall SPAA in a completely flat spawn with zero cover, allowing enemy tanks to snipe it from across the map. In real life, an SPAA wouldn’t even be on the front line. This kind of map design is just ridiculous.
1 Like
Bangladeshi Eurofighter in Chinese TT
1 Like
Well, Indonesia operates the Rafale, but it doesnt get added.
Ah, yes, of course.
One 13.7 seeing top tier will truly disrupt the balance at that BR range, there’s DEFINITELY no other, worse offenders ALREADY in the game but at an even lower BR.
Riiiight…
1 Like
They could do that, but that would be a fantasy weapon
Not that I would be entirely against that. It would be interesting to see stuff like the Active Skyflash/Skyflash Mk.2, the Rb 73, the S225X/S225XR, the AIM-7R, the AIM-97, the Red Dean, the (mythical) A-Darter, etc
Or SRAAMs on the other planes that were meant to carry it (Tornado, Jaguar, F-4, F-5 and A-4)
2 Likes
It will be added in the tech tree, just wait another year. Probably UK and Japan TT will get the Rafales at the same time.
2 Likes
Can we expect to see the Arjun in the next update?
It has been a while since we saw something Japanese being added to the TT that isnt a boat or a premium.
It would be nice to see something Japanese for once.
1 Like
Oh DO go on )))))
1 Like
Oh, you don’t need to tell me, hahah.
I have been waiting for so many years for so many long overdue fixes regarding MBTs…
Missing spall liners, underperforming armor and armor holes, underperforming shells, broken mobility/steering in other tanks, etc… all reported, proved and acknowledged; yet unaddressed even after years.
So yeah, it’s frustrating and disappointing to see radio silence in those regards… but still.
2 Likes
A-4s could carry ASRAAM? Which variant?
I read Japan, Italy and China here.
Not US and Ru, how surprising 🙃
None, it never was integrated
Also, I said SRAAM, not ASRAAM
1 Like
Who knows. Hopefully it below 10.7 else it be worse then DOA. Every time it’s talked about I just learn even more on how bad if an MBT it is.
Gaijin seem to have a habit of focusing on stuff the already has plenty of options for the UK well also being unliked by those playing the nation.
2 Likes
U.S would fall into the “underperforming armor and armor holes” category xD
2 Likes
So anyway, when’s the Gaijin marketing department gonna stop rigging the hell out of the BR changes so we can see a fix made by an actual human?
Now THAT is a question that I’d like to see answered…
2 Likes