minimum
I think its less whether that amber racks could or couldnt fire missiles and more that they were proven to not be functional?
you cant get more than 16…
Well I’m fine with 16 missiles too, I’ve been saying this from the start. They’re most likely real, and at least as real as the current GE loadout so it would be 100% ok for the game
i could go into a whole rant about why the amber racks are more realistic than other racks theyve added in game, but idc enough to, 16 is fine to me but even more would be cool
Yes, they are real racks, as I’ve stated many times myself.
Also, why would I get up in arms about any mentioned jets?
I don’t have classified documents, and even if I did I wouldn’t be able to share them.
Cause the only thing that’s going to disprove J-10C for example, is a manual that includes loadout restrictions made recently, which isn’t going to be accessible to us, let alone the fact I don’t speak Mandarin.
@PyroAddict
You used the wrong word.
The correct word to use in the sentence is “buffing”.
It should read as “Your high expectations of American jets are basically impossible to achieve without actively buffing the US air tech tree.”
i agree w you there
What do you mean by not functional
@AydanL44_Hunter bro ce gars est un ragebait de malade, un coté il te dit ouia 16 c’est ok, l’autre non 16 c’est minimum et peut avoit plus
I’ve played a couple of matches in the JH-7A, the F-14 IRIAF and even the Tornado F.3 late and I cannot agree with that
The premium Sukhois are pretty strong, but they don’t ruin the game at all
the eurofighter and su30 also exist alvis
As in they could only mount missiles. They were never wired to the actual aircraft. I don’t remember where but i remember reading it somewhere on this forum.
Alvis: HOW IS NOT ALLOWING THE F-15EX TO HAVE AMBER RACKS A BUFF.
Spoiler
Tkt c’est ok xD
Oh ok, yeah that would make sense. Would have to see the source, but anyway we can assume things don’t work until they’re proved to work so we’re fine
The R-77 dual pylon brochure mentioned multiple Flankers when someone cited it, and Su-30SM, SM2, and MKM are too new to argue against as well.
WIthout evidence that Sukhoi uses older fire control systems on newer Flankers, I can’t know if they’re incorrect.
As for Typhoon, I have no evidence to prove otherwise.
@PyroAddict
Allowing MRMLs on F-15EX.*
That’s my expectation, not AMBER, and not “not allowing”.
However, my expectation doesn’t have evidence.
bro go on mute ur points are so redundant. the second anyon edebates you u just circle back to the same bs over and over
Facing Fox-3 slingers when you don’t have neither them or even radar missiles at all is just… bad xD
Also SCREW IRAFS AND THEIR FAKOURS (second trauma at that BR besides the Su-30s xD)
1 Like
i dont get why people rlly think that the f16 they are adding is an adequate addition to toptier’s current status